Twitter's ad sales down 59% as advertisers worry about toxicity, Musk's tweets, and porn

midian182

Posts: 9,748   +121
Staff member
In brief: It's no secret that many advertisers abandoned Twitter after Elon Musk acquired it, but the billionaire said in April that most of them have returned. According to a new report, however, the company's advertising revenue is down 59% year-on-year, which could be due to advertisers' concerns over the increasing amount of hate speech and pornography on the platform.

According to an internal presentation seen by the New York Times, Twitter's US advertising revenue for the five weeks between April 1 and the first week of May was $88 million, down 59% from a year earlier. The platform regularly falls short of its sales projections, sometimes by as much as 30%, and according to the documents and former employees, that isn't going to change anytime soon.

During a Twitter Space event on Monday, Musk said half the company's advertising had disappeared due to advertisers in Europe and North America putting extreme pressure on the company. "They are trying to drive Twitter bankrupt," he said.

The pattern of less advertising is a concern for a company that makes 90% of its revenue from ads. Musk firing executives, spreading conspiracy theories, and allowing banned users back onto the site has worsened Twitter's appeal in the eyes of advertisers. So has the massive increase in ads for online gambling, marijuana products, and erectile dysfunction products and services.

Twitter has always been home to adult content, but it's becoming a problem for family-friendly companies. Employers trying to garner interest for Mother's Day found that potential sponsored search terms, like "MomLife," were returning videos you wouldn't want your mother to see.

Employees told the publication that some of the biggest advertisers on Twitter, including Apple, Amazon, and Disney, had been spending less on advertising on the platform than last year. One example is the large banner ads on the trends page that can cost $500,000 for 24 hours. They're almost always bought by large brands but now often go unfulfilled.

Six ad agency execs who have worked with Twitter said their clients continue to limit spending on the platform, blaming Musk's changes, inconsistent support - likely related to the number of staff Musk fired - and the misleading and toxic content on the platform. The Pentagon explosion photo (above) that went viral on Twitter is a good example of the former. Fake images like these created by AI are something the EU wants clearly labeled on social media.

Musk's tweets, like the one comparing George Soros to Magneto, aren't helping the situation, either. Neither has Twitter's head of trust and safety and its head of brand safety and ad quality resigning.

It's not all doom and gloom for Musk. Some marketers are returning to Twitter, albeit with a cautious approach, and it is looking at ways to make it easier for advertisers to buy space on the site. With Linda Yaccarino now CEO and Musk stepping back slightly, Twitter might look a little more appealing, or at least less risky, to advertisers.

Permalink to story.

 
The funny thing is that Twitter is finally profitable for the first time in its 17 year history.

Remember, Twitter wanted this. They sued Musk to buy them.
Fire your workers, you will be profitable as long as no changes is required;)
Twitter owners wanted this, because selling company for above market prices were great chance to make money. Trash ads providers wanted this, because they can get more audience for their borderline pr)n stuff. And radicals wanted it as well, because they can spit on anyone without being blocked. Aaaand.... that's it, I guess, ordinary users moves to mastodont or dropping this crap alltogether. Sure average user count is similar, just - that is kinda different demography now.
 
The funny thing is that Twitter is finally profitable for the first time in its 17 year history.

Remember, Twitter wanted this. They sued Musk to buy them.
Sure, it's profitable, but how profitable and for how long? Musk spent 40+ billion on this thing and another 40+ billion lost from his wealth after selling Tesla stock and taking on a massive loan to pay for it. How long will it take him to make that money back? A hundred years? Of course he says he doesn't care about money, this is about saving humanity, remember? A social platform full of porn, hate speech, and racism is definitely the way to do that.
 
It is critically important to stand by a man that supports Matt Walsh and his film "What is a Woman".
Yes, the most important thing in the world is whatever the extreme right is currently hung up on. Last week it was Walmart selling rainbow colored shirts, this week it's some stupid movie nobody cares about. What's next week's agenda? I heard tap water makes you gay, may you people should boycott that.
 
Yes, the most important thing in the world is whatever the extreme right is currently hung up on. Last week it was Walmart selling rainbow colored shirts, this week it's some stupid movie nobody cares about. What's next week's agenda? I heard tap water makes you gay, may you people should boycott that.

For a collective that's anti cancel culture they sure love cancelling things.
 
Gambling, marijuana, and sexual performance ads. sound like the same people who advertised on fox entertainment news for *****s. Looks like musk is going after the great gullible & unwashed
 
Fire your workers, you will be profitable as long as no changes is required;)
Twitter owners wanted this, because selling company for above market prices were great chance to make money. Trash ads providers wanted this, because they can get more audience for their borderline pr)n stuff. And radicals wanted it as well, because they can spit on anyone without being blocked. Aaaand.... that's it, I guess, ordinary users moves to mastodont or dropping this crap alltogether. Sure average user count is similar, just - that is kinda different demography now.
Elon fired around 8000 people at twitter. I look at what twitter is and wonder why it needed nearly 10,000 people to run it
 
The funny thing is that Twitter is finally profitable for the first time in its 17 year history.

Remember, Twitter wanted this. They sued Musk to buy them.
Exactly. First the shareholders did everything to stop Musk from buying them, then at the last minute they sold.

Simply put, shareholders don't care about the people but only look at the dollar sign but yet no one blames the shareholders for selling them out. Perhaps the shareholders had seen something coming and decided to take the money and move on. By the way Jack Dorsey received a substantial check from the buyout of about $978 million as he owned 2.4% of the company (18 million shares) and he approved the sale of Twitter. Rich people are not as honest as they seem to be no matter left, right or neither.
 
Last edited:
Back