Endymio
Posts: 2,703 +2,718
Since it appears that only anti-Trump postings are now allowed on the main thread, I thought I'd move the discussion to here. The Washington Post -- itself owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos -- claims that the USPS does not lose money on Amazon packages, but instead makes a large profit -- $1.6B. WaPo frames the story in the context of an attack on President Trump's veracity, but their original reporting -- and TechSpot's regurgitation of it -- leaves out a few key facts. Independent analysts have for years questioned the USPS's accounting methods. A Citigroup analysis from 2017, for instance, found that the USPS's discounted postage rate given especially to Amazon effectively results in a subsidy of $1.46 per box shipped, a subsidy that the Wall Street Journal called, "A Gift Card from Uncle Sam":
Why the Post Office Gives Amazon Special Delivery
The Post Office justifies the ultra-low rates for Amazon by a special cost-accounting method. The fixed costs of operating the postal facilities themselves, the airplanes and delivery trucks, and the massively expensive health and retirement benefits due postal workers are charged almost entirely to mail. Not packages. Normal packages -- those shipped by you and me -- thus effectively receive a small subsidy. Amazon, however, pays a rate far less than we do. By some analysts estimates, Amazon is able to ship a medium-sized box across the country for less than the price of a first-class letter-- despite the fact that the box weighs more than ten times as much and takes up more than 50 times as much cargo space in the hold of a cargo airliner or the back of a delivery truck. Since all those costs are excluded, it becomes easy to show a profit on packages, even Amazon's fifty-cent specials.
The Post Office justifies this by the following rationale. "We have a legal responsibility to deliver mail, so those postal offices, and those fleets of jets and mail trucks have to be operated regardless, and that army of postal workers paid regardless of whether or not we deliver packages. So we don't charge those costs to packages."
Is this a rational argument? Reasonable people can disagree. However, one thing is indisputable. For WaPo -- or TechSpot -- to claim that it has "debunked" the statement that Post Office loses money on Amazon packages is itself a complete fabrication.
Why the Post Office Gives Amazon Special Delivery
The Post Office justifies the ultra-low rates for Amazon by a special cost-accounting method. The fixed costs of operating the postal facilities themselves, the airplanes and delivery trucks, and the massively expensive health and retirement benefits due postal workers are charged almost entirely to mail. Not packages. Normal packages -- those shipped by you and me -- thus effectively receive a small subsidy. Amazon, however, pays a rate far less than we do. By some analysts estimates, Amazon is able to ship a medium-sized box across the country for less than the price of a first-class letter-- despite the fact that the box weighs more than ten times as much and takes up more than 50 times as much cargo space in the hold of a cargo airliner or the back of a delivery truck. Since all those costs are excluded, it becomes easy to show a profit on packages, even Amazon's fifty-cent specials.
The Post Office justifies this by the following rationale. "We have a legal responsibility to deliver mail, so those postal offices, and those fleets of jets and mail trucks have to be operated regardless, and that army of postal workers paid regardless of whether or not we deliver packages. So we don't charge those costs to packages."
Is this a rational argument? Reasonable people can disagree. However, one thing is indisputable. For WaPo -- or TechSpot -- to claim that it has "debunked" the statement that Post Office loses money on Amazon packages is itself a complete fabrication.