also @ TechSpot: Check your bill: AT&T adds new 'administrative fee' to wireless bills

Which is the WORST OS ever created by MS?

Discussion in 'Windows OS' started by SharkFiNbowL, Apr 29, 2003.

?

Which is the WORST OS ever created by Windows?

Windows 95 12 vote(s) 10.8%
Windows 98 5 vote(s) 4.5%
Windows ME 81 vote(s) 73.0%
Windows 2000 3 vote(s) 2.7%
Windows XP 7 vote(s) 6.3%
Windows Vista 3 vote(s) 2.7%
Page 4 of 4

  1. SNGX1275 TS Special Forces Posts: 11,894   +117

    It was nearly entirely the same platform as Windows 2000. I'd put stability/reliability of Windows 2000 SP4 up against any machine running XP SP2. The functionality is nearly identical too. There really isn't anything you can do in XP that you can't do in 2000. Even (some?) XP/Vista only games can be made to run in 2000.

    I've ran 2000 a bit, ran XP a lot, and been running Vista since Feburary. But every time people point out problems with Vista and say there is no reason to upgrade from XP, I like to point out that if they really believed that then why are they running XP over 2000.
    SNGX1275, Nov 6, 2007
    #61

  2. zipperman Newcomer, in training Posts: 1,423   +7

    Whats your point ?

    I'm running XP over WMe.Never considered 2000.
    Never even saw it advertised or heard of 2 day lineups like XP had.
    And i mean a full $260 XP Home.Not an upgrade.
    My answer to the ? is W95A and W98.
    98se was a big improvement.
    So answer the question as described.;)

    Removed unnecessary quote.
    zipperman, Nov 7, 2007
    #62
Page 4 of 4
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.

Add New Comment

Social Login & Guest Posting

TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.