i am not voting for xp either. anyway at least XP does not welcome you before kicking you out.@mad
My pricing comment was aimed at consumer market; but about business you are perfectly right, Thanks.
@theruck
You could have easily configured it not to bother you by asking you to confirm you actions; but anyway it is a personal choice.
Secondly, even on XP if you ever had a chance to work on corporate networks, you would wait for a while before it will actually tells you that you have entered the wrong password, which is pretty similar san the welcome thing.
You are pretty much on target regarding operating/support costs vs acquirement costs. But, it has been my experience that there are more OSX systems on average on a university than Linux (excluding server only systems), and that's not including the student population. How do you figure Linuxs' popularity?Guest said:
Linux is mostly used in universities. No business with their right mind will use Linux as the client operating system because the support cost is higher than that for windows. Note that for a business, compared to the support cost, the cost of the OS itself is negligible.
klepto12 said:
i do think xp was a great OS but i also think M$ kicked there self by taking to long to release Vista that made so many people love XP do remember all the problems xp had when it was released? Also i hate that M$ thinks it needs to release a new OS every 3 years i love blowing $260 every 3 years on a new OS.
I don't get it. If you buy a new OS every 3 years, That's about .18 cents a day. Anybody who buys a can of soda, cup of coffee, or a granola bar a day spends 4-5 times that...for coffee!
and that is if you are not eligible for, or wait for any sales.
ruzveh said:
This estimate are so unrealistic and fake in nature. First u remove the support from XP and push Win7 forcebly onto users and then come out that Win7 is selling better. It has to do better because there is no alternative left with users like us who still wants to do with XP OS. Do we have choice ?
Dude... you must really be smoking the whacky tobaccey. Too long to release Vista? They released it too soon! They rushed it to get sales in and by doing so they didn't have a completely finished and tested product. WIndows 7 is what Vista should of been all along, but M$ didn't take their time to finish the job the first time.
XP did have tons of problems on release, it took them awhile but they got it down and then it was a solid product, and still is. Same with Vista in a way... it is better now than it was on release. But Windows 7 was pretty much solid on release. I do agree with you however on the annoyance of a M$ having to release a new OS every 3 years... but that is what people want I think. But where are you spending $260 on each release??? Don't you do upgrades or wait for good deals?
Oh and you haven't replied to my reply to your first post. Com'on man lets keep this pissing contest going!