Home › News › Industry News
Michael Lynn dispute reaches resolution
Cisco's approach of trying, at all costs seemingly, to silence Lynn on how he reverse-engineered Cisco's software to exploit a known flaw has received unfavourable responses from the security community.
"I am afraid that this controversy will be a setback for security researchers and the full disclosure concept," Fletcher said. "I understand the fact that companies need to have time to patch problems before they are released to the entire world, but it is also important that the world receive this notification within a reasonable time period of the discovery."
"Many of the people working in the trenches to keep our networks secure are very frustrated at the lack of support from their vendors and their employers when it comes to plugging holes like this one," said Stephen Cobb, author of Privacy for Business.
Related Stories
User Comments (2)
Post a comment|
smtkr
on July 29, 2005 11:06 AM |
In other words, if your system is insecure, you don't have the right to know about it. |
|
Phantasm66
on July 29, 2005 12:16 PM |
Its not as simple as that. This is a really bad issue, in fact. It means that big corporations are prepared to bully security experts to protect intellectual property rights, reguardless of the eventual effect on the health of the internet. Its bad news. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Monitor Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.