Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
TechSpot Blog: Disable Windows automatic check for solutions after a program crashes featured
Intel's six-core Gulftown processor benchmarked months early
Another iPhone worm spotted, this time it's dangerous
Stardock CEO: Steam holds 70% of digital game distribution market
Microsoft issues warning for IE6, IE7 security hole
Samsung intros 2TB, eSATA-packing Story Station Plus external HDD
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
My Windows Seven Desktop by Punkid | toobig by SNGX1275 |
Security settings by VicRic | TechSpot at CES 2007 by Julio |
Hardware
Intel takes chipset dispute with Nvidia to court
The discrepancies between Intel and Nvidia over the terms of a 2004 chipset licensing agreement have unsurprisingly evolved into a into a full-on legal showdown, with the former now seeking a declaratory judgment that would prevent Nvidia from peddling nForce motherboards that support any Intel processor with integrated memory controller functionality.
They are of course referring to the Nehalem architecture behind Core i7, which is their first to use an embedded memory controller that the company calls QuickPath Interconnect (QPI). Intel maintains that the agreements between the two does not extend to those technologies while Nvidia says that they contain no language that limits the licensing to specific products and does not carry any sort of expiration date.
Furthermore, Nvidia’s president and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang has publicly accused the chip maker of trying to pull licensing as a way of dominating the computer market, adding that Intel is worried because “the CPU has run its course and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the GPU.” The graphics firm says it has been trying to resolve the problem with Intel in a “fair and reasonable manner” for more than a year, though it has also had no problem in blaming them for many of the ills that the technology industry is facing – blaming Atom for the backslide in PC sales and noting that their netbook platform is vastly inferior than Ion.
They are of course referring to the Nehalem architecture behind Core i7, which is their first to use an embedded memory controller that the company calls QuickPath Interconnect (QPI). Intel maintains that the agreements between the two does not extend to those technologies while Nvidia says that they contain no language that limits the licensing to specific products and does not carry any sort of expiration date.
Furthermore, Nvidia’s president and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang has publicly accused the chip maker of trying to pull licensing as a way of dominating the computer market, adding that Intel is worried because “the CPU has run its course and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the GPU.” The graphics firm says it has been trying to resolve the problem with Intel in a “fair and reasonable manner” for more than a year, though it has also had no problem in blaming them for many of the ills that the technology industry is facing – blaming Atom for the backslide in PC sales and noting that their netbook platform is vastly inferior than Ion.
Related Stories
User Comments (4)
Post a comment| captain828 on February 19, 2009 5:13 AM | Some competition on Intel's i7 chipset would be really
good. Curios to see how it will end...
|
| JDoors on February 19, 2009 1:02 PM | Nvidia’s president and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang ... [says] ...
that Intel is worried because “the CPU has run its course
and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the
GPU.” What nonsense. If he's that dishonest (or delusional), Intel has nothing to worry about. Competition: Good. Cheating on your license agreement: Bad.
|
| tengeta on February 19, 2009 9:35 PM | Yeah, GPU's will never overcome CPU's for the simple reason
most people aren't gaming on their PC. Thats just ridiculous, I might actually end up siding with Intel on this one.
|
| howzz1854 on February 22, 2009 1:21 PM | he's not talking about gaming on the PC, he's referring to
CUDA, which allows GPU's mass stream processor to function
as everyday application. right now there're only a few
things you can run CUDA on, like video encoding, and other
render intensive stuff. but IMO intel should be worried
because if Nvidia/ATI can figure out a way to introduce a
common language for their GPU to function in every
application. i believe CPU's role will be quickly
diminished. just look at the performance difference between
encoding a H264 movie with a Core2 Exteme CPU and a moderate
Geforece 8800GT GPU, the difference is something like 10
times faster.
|

TechSpot RSS



