Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Booo, letting the market stagnate because of reckless marketing by service providers. =(
"3-12Mbps while the term was originally intended for networks sporting mobile data rates of 100Mbps. "
That's a big ****ing gap guys.
The organization is wrong in its concession to the competing 4G claims, because HSPA+ can never accurately be called 4G. It's a very good, very fast 3G network, but it's still a 3G network.
They should post real world figures for every broadband plan that they market alongside the theoretical maximum. We all know that those fancy terms mean nothing if we can't even get a wireless signal.
If you market it, it will be true... wait what?
you are lucky in the u.s. that 3-12mbps is "broadband 4g"...
here in the philippines, 512kbps is "broadband wimax"...
-globe wimax user
you are lucky in the u.s. that 3-12mbps is "broadband 4g"...
here in the philippines, 512kbps is "broadband wimax"...
-globe wimax user
Then your ISP is lying. Broadband is 4mbps downstream.
Carrier: "Yes, this is the new technology!"
Customer: "So how fast is it?"
Carrier: "REALLY FAST!"
Customer: "I'll take it!"
How many times have you seen that happen?
I just lost all respect for ITU... But heck now I can release my 6G technology next summer.
What are all of the cable providers going to do when the real 4g hits? Everyone will use their phones for their wi-fi hotspots, what will be the point of paying for internet.
What are all of the cable providers going to do when the real 4g hits? Everyone will use their phones for their wi-fi hotspots, what will be the point of paying for internet.
Because 500mb of data will be a $40 addon to your plan. And they'll restrict tethering. Also they'll probably charge around 40 cents a kilobyte for overage. They already charge that for pay per use so why the **** not?
They can track tethering you know, because it uses certain ports.
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.