Most Popular
| Top Stories | Latest | Featured |
Weekend open forum: Windows 7 target to boot in under 15 seconds
Asus releases F6V laptops with scent
Intel prepares to discontinue multiple Core 2 processors
LG details upcoming Blu-ray / Netflix player
AMD prepares two new low-cost low-power CPUs
Microsoft to release four critical patches next Tuesday
Newsletter
| Newsletter | TechSpot Poll |
You can also subscribe to our daily feeds using:
Reviews
ASUS EN8800GTS GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB review
![]() |
By Steven Walton on April 5, 2007
Manufacturer: ASUS Find videocard prices |


Despite of being a somewhat old game, Far Cry still gave the 640MB graphics card a definite advantage at 1600x1200, approximately 18% faster than the cheaper 320MB version. Again this margin was significantly smaller at 1280x1024, as the 640MB card was just 4% faster at this resolution.


F.E.A.R used to be a very demanding game, though after several patches it is now quite well optimized. Nevertheless, we do see a massive difference in performance between the 320MB and 640MB cards in this test. At 1600x1200 with the AA/AF settings turned up the 640MB card is a whopping 62% faster than the 320MB version. Even at 1280x1024 the 640MB card is still 36% faster. Clearly F.E.A.R really needs that extra on board memory, otherwise you will end up with some serious performance hit.





