Read with Formatting | Join TechSpot! (it's free)



amd vs intel

wiscountryboy
07-11-2007, 01:05 PM
hey guys ive read a ton about the core 2 duo kickin amd ***....but i was shopping and it seems that all the core 2 duos are so much more expensive for the realatively same ghz speed.....so i was wondering what were 2 relatively similar cpus in the performance category....

i am looking right now at the amd 5000 x2 just to give u guys a cpu that i would like 2 have...

Mike

w0lf
07-11-2007, 01:57 PM
I'm running a Core 2 duo 2.4 G, and an Amd 4800 x2, and I have to say both are awesome systems. Yes, when reading performance reviews on the net, the Core 2 does seem to perform better, but here in South Africa my Intel cpu is almost twice the price of the Amd. So, I think if you're looking for the best performance-to-price ratio, then probably go for the Amd.

Ad
07-11-2007, 01:57 PM

SNGX1275
07-11-2007, 02:10 PM
Google up some benchmarks. Mhz/Ghz has always been a pretty worthless comparison for 2 different chips running on different technologies. So in other words you can't compare a 2.4Ghz Core2Duo to a 3.0Ghz Pentium D and expect the Pentium D to win. Similar applies comparing Intel to AMD.

Maybe somebody will do the research for you and post a comparable performing C2D to that x2, but your best bet is googling yourself.

kpo6969
07-12-2007, 03:24 AM
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2/pricevperf/index.x?pg=1

http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2007q1/cpus/index.x?pg=1

k.jacko
07-12-2007, 03:48 AM
I've always worked on (and actually tested) for comparability, the E6300 core2duo and the AMD 5000+. Both are about the same price and compare in performance too.
BUT, i'd choose the E6300 cos you can overclock it to hell and back. Put it in a Gigabyte DS3 mobo and you could get up to 3GHz with a stock cooler (if you're lucky). You'll definitely get 3GHz, with an AMC and decent ram though.
THERE is the difference in quality.

wiscountryboy
07-16-2007, 03:27 PM
alright thanks guys....i had heard that anything intel had to offer was crap inside a given price range...but now im all cleared up...

ChrisLam
07-16-2007, 03:58 PM
Intel also uses less energy for its Core2Duo chips and they run at a lower temperature so you can overclock them more.

mancURmission
07-16-2007, 04:14 PM
Don't forget we are on the brink of the new 1333 FSB range, so current price of core 2's will drop, its all good!

Ad
07-16-2007, 04:14 PM

MetalX
07-16-2007, 04:29 PM
Yes, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is supposed to go down to only $266 after the QX6850 is released.

ChrisLam
07-16-2007, 04:31 PM
$266 only? wow. How much does it cost now? about $450?

mancURmission
07-16-2007, 04:36 PM
That will make the quad a more appealing chip, but still not for the gamer, not enough multi threaded software available, good for the multi tasker.

Barney_Calhoun
09-02-2007, 01:35 AM
Stupid question, Wheres the poll?

AMD.

hamas123
01-13-2008, 05:44 AM
If there's a 2.0 ghz intel core 2 duo and an AMD Phenom 2.0 ghz which one will be faster ?

MetalX
01-13-2008, 02:03 PM
Core 2 Duo. But why resurrect this thread...?

captaincranky
01-13-2008, 02:56 PM
CPU comparison chart. Threads like this are for sissies. After 40 pages of this you'll need a nap. If you have trouble falling asleep, try counting processor specifications! http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/07/16/cpu_charts_2007/

 Tech News

 Downloads
Copyright © 1998-2008 TechSpot.com. TechSpot is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.