also @ TechSpot: Weekend Open Forum: Google Chrome OS and the future of cloud computing
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Feedback > Articles and Reviews Comments

AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition review

Reply
Bookmark Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-14-2008
Julio's Avatar
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,721 posts
System specs
AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition review

Although the release of the AMD Phenom processor series took place back in November of last year, roughly four months ago now, the highly touted quad-core processor has received limited action so far in the computer world and a lot of negative press coverage for reasons we have documented well enough during all this time.

In our hands-on experience with the first wave of Phenoms, we didn't think the situation was as dire as many made it out to be. But regardless, it was a combination of a poor product launch with corporate financial trouble that raised the company to the spotlight.

In terms of performance, AMD has stated that the new B3 processors will be no faster than the original Phenom X4 CPUs without the TLB erratum fix enabled on a clock-for-clock basis. Therefore the Phenom X4 9600 and the new Phenom X4 9650, for example, should be no different in terms of performance. Just as well that should mean that today’s flagship Phenom, the X4 9850, should sit somewhere between the Phenom 9700 and 9900 processors that we reviewed earlier this year.

It will be interesting to see how the 9850 stacks up against the rest of the Phenom family and of course, Intel's Q6600.

http://www.techspot.com/review/93-am...black-edition/

Please leave your feedback here. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2008
Cypherdude's Avatar
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Apr 2008, 1 posts
After learning AMD's new 9850 with its B3 stepping had arrived, I was hoping it would do well. I was disappointed with the test results. I think I'll stick with Intel. In fact, Intel has their new Quad Q9300 now for only about $320 and it's probably 50% faster than AMD's 9850:

TechSpot might want to include the Q9300 in their test results. I'm sure it would test much faster.
Reply With Quote
To remove this ad, sign in. To register for a new account, click here.
  
  #3  
Old 04-16-2008
Mirob's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Out of Spec.
Member since: Jul 2005, 817 posts
System specs
I just installed my $198 Q6600 (FRYS.COM deal.) I never even booted Windows at 2.4ghz. It's at 3.5ghz.in a Tforce 965PT (better mobo on the way, 4ghz!)

You didn't show power numbers. I'm sure they are high.

I guess this is a good thing, or at least it is a step in the right direction. I hope 45nm is a lot better.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2008
Julio's Avatar
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,721 posts
System specs
Cypherdude, we will review the the Q9300 (or any of the newer quad cores) as soon as we can get one, it wasn't just in time for this particular review.

That said, the Q6600 matches the price of this Phenom and thus made for the perfect comparison - not that we consider this a coincidence.

The newer Intel quads are just becoming available and are bit more expensive (and likely a bit faster, too).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tip: Download Advanced SystemCare 3 Freeware - 1 Click A Day to Clean, Repair, Protect & Optimize your PC.

Thread Tools


Similar Topics
Topic Category Replies Last Post
ASUS Maximus Formula (Special Edition) review Articles and Reviews Comments 6 12-31-2007 03:15 PM
ASUS P5K Deluxe WiFi-AP Edition review Articles and Reviews Comments 2 07-04-2007 06:09 PM
XP Home Edition loads to black screen Windows OS 1 03-21-2007 12:41 PM
OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 FlexXLC Edition review Articles and Reviews Comments 14 02-10-2007 09:18 AM
User Review: Western Digital Special Edition 120GB HDD Storage & Networking 12 10-08-2003 09:57 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.