TechSpot
 
Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > Hardware & Tweaking > CPUs, Chipsets and Mobos
Forgot?

Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

Performance help

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2008, 04:20 PM
Frantic225 Frantic225 is offline
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: May 2008, 3 posts
Performance help

Hi guys, I've seen some cool answers in this forum and I have a few questions I couldn't find any straight answers to, I'm hoping one of you will help me out

I'm going to upgrade my PC (Athlon64x2, 3G DDR2) so I can get decent (constant 75 or above) fps in TF2.

1st question:
I'm going to go for a Core2Duo (3GHz, 1333bus, E8400) or Core2Quad (2667MHz, 1066bus, Q6700), I'm not sure which yet. From what I've read and seen in benchmarks the extra 2 cores doesn't really help the games. Thing is, most of the time I have Thunderbird, Opera, Firefox, Pidgin, Winamp, some editors open. The Core2Quad is more expensive and potentially less powerful for games, but would the 2 extra cores help deal with the other apps in my case?

2nd question:
My RAM is DDR2-667MHz. Is this a bottleneck in my system? How could I find out?

3rd question:
I've looked at some mobos, and there are very few differences between ~$100-$200. Besides having the correct bus speed, PCI slot, RAM frequency, is anything else important for performance? The only real plus I see for more expensive mobos is the SLI support that I doubt I will ever use.

I'm looking forward to your opinions
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2008, 04:50 PM
Whiffen's Avatar
Whiffen Whiffen is offline
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Ottawa, ON
Member since: Dec 2007, 171 posts
System specs
1: Yes, it will run all those applications better with a quad core, but the 8400 is sufficient. Really I don't think the quad core will make that big of a difference in performance over the 8400. For the 8400's price/performance and because its a bit better for gaming I would go for that.

2: As long as it isn't value RAM it shouldn't be to bad. The speed you will want depends on what speeds the mobo you get supports.

3: You want one that has everything you will need regarding the present and future. These days ( PCI-E slot, AM2 / LGA775 socket, SATA ports, DDR2/DDR3 slots and anything else that meets your needs) which basically come with every mobo nowadays, so you want to take a looks at the chipset and FBS.

This would be a nice one.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131225

Last edited by Whiffen : 05-09-2008 at 04:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #3  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:03 PM
Frantic225 Frantic225 is offline
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: May 2008, 3 posts
The RAM issue is my biggest concern to be honest.
Is 667MHz enough? Is it limiting the performance? Do I need to upgrade? Does anyone know?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:41 PM
Whiffen's Avatar
Whiffen Whiffen is offline
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Ottawa, ON
Member since: Dec 2007, 171 posts
System specs
I think 667 MHz / DDR2 PC2 5300 or 675 MHz / DDR2 PC2 5400 will do it just right.

Memory: 667 DRAM / 2 = 333 MHz
Processor: 1333 FSB / 4 = 333 MHz

Giving a 1:1 ratio so none will be bottle necked.

Heres the formula for if you ever need to find this for anything else

Code:
Stated FSB/4 = Actual FSB Multiplier x Actual FSB = CPU Speed 1:1 Ratio: 2 x Actual FSB = RAM Speed 1:1 Ratio: FSB = 1/2 RAM speed

In your case:


1333 / 4 = 333
9 x 333 = 2999
1:1 Ratio: 2 x 333 = ~667
1:1 Ratio: 333 = 2 / 667

Here is what you would need for overclocking.

E8400:
Multi x Actual FSB, RAM Speed = Clock Speed
9 x 333Mhz, DDR2 667 RAM = 3.0Ghz <== Stock Speeds
9 x 400Mhz, DDR2 800 RAM = 3.6Ghz <== Easy OC
9 x 450Mhz, DDR2 900 RAM = 4.0Ghz <== Good OC
9 x 500Mhz, DDR2 1000 RAM = 4.5Ghz <== Excellent OC

Last edited by Whiffen : 05-09-2008 at 09:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2008, 03:27 AM
Frantic225 Frantic225 is offline
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: May 2008, 3 posts
Thanks very much, exactly what I was looking for
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much more performance? Ragnorth CPUs, Chipsets and Mobos 3 03-09-2008 01:57 PM
RAM performance HughJass Other Hardware 1 05-12-2007 10:22 AM
F.E.A.R Performance ? JimShady23 Audio and Video 60 01-17-2007 05:15 PM
VGA 8x performance on AGP 4x Panzer_Faust Device Drivers 2 01-22-2006 07:28 AM
VERy low gf4 performance IVIojo Audio and Video 1 10-18-2003 11:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.


  TechSpot  The PC Enthusiast Resource    |    News    |    Reviews    |    Guides    |    Downloads    |    Drivers    |    Forums    |    Pricewatch    |    News Archive    |    RSS Feeds
  Our Blog    |    Tech Deals    |   vb Sitemap    |    User Gallery    |    Startup Radar    |    Icons by Foood    |    Powered by StoryTeller    |    TechSpot in Spanish

  Copyright © 1998-2008 TechSpot.com. TechSpot is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy policy.
Advertising | About TechSpot 
TechSpot Pricewatch TechSpot Hot Deals
Windows Startup Radar Tips & Tricks (blog) Guides & Tweaks Windows updates
News Archive TechSpot Blog TechSpot RSS Feeds User Picture Gallery Techspot's IRC# (Chat) TechSpot in Spanish