also @ TechSpot: HDD supply to recover by Q3 2012, prices to remain high
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > TechSpot News and Comments

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

OS X Snow Leopard upgrade will cost $29, ships in September

Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-08-2009
Jos Jos is offline
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Apr 2006, 904 posts
System specs
OS X Snow Leopard upgrade will cost $29, ships in September

First announced at the WWDC 2008, Apple has finally given Snow Leopard a ship date and a price at this year’s Keynote address. The next major update to Mac OS X will be available in September, according to the company, and will be available to current Leopard users for just under $30. Apple says it has refined 90% of the operating system, and simply by installing it on their Macs customers will reclaim a whopping 6GB of hard drive space.

Read the whole story
__________________
Jose Vilches
Managing Editor
  #2  
Old 06-08-2009
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,815 posts
System specs
Amusing to see them undercut the upgrade price to 7. Even at that low of a price I may hold off upgrading until 10.7 just because the only Mac I have capable of SL is used as an htpc, and its working fine as is.
  #3  
Old 06-08-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Centreville, VA
Member since: Dec 2008, 103 posts
System specs
Well, it might be a jab at MS, but it's pretty much true. ;P They're really just improving on an operating system that works perfectly fine for current tech.
  #4  
Old 06-08-2009
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,815 posts
System specs
Yeh. Leopard is pretty good, I don't think Apple really innovated anything with SL, they just are improving it and dropping PPC support (which sucks for me, but was inevitable). Aside from an awesome 3d interface like compiz I'm not sure how much more they can improve an OS now (this goes for Windows and Mac).
  #5  
Old 06-08-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Centreville, VA
Member since: Dec 2008, 103 posts
System specs
My comment was more regarding Windows. I haven't really done much work with Macs, but from what I've seen... they're more keen on producing more innovative and good looking features than MS. I've seen some videos touting Leopard and it looks aesthetically pleasing, that's for sure. I'd be interested, again, in seeing a video of Snow Leopard in action.
  #6  
Old 06-08-2009
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,815 posts
System specs
I'm a 50/50 mac pc user, I run both. For real work I do tend to use PCs more only because of office, but Office 08 on Mac is great. And I also am a Vista user, so I'm probably in the ignored group that doesn't have any problem with either os. I'm only slightly upset with SL because it won't run on old macs., but this happens, I knew it would happen. The same thing happened between 680xx macs vs PPC macs, and yes I was a mac user when that happened.
  #7  
Old 06-08-2009
Tekkaraiden's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Mar 2009, 612 posts
Wow, now if only Microsoft would match the price for users of Windows.....
  #8  
Old 06-08-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Centreville, VA
Member since: Dec 2008, 103 posts
System specs
Indeed. ;P
  #9  
Old 06-08-2009
tengeta's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Member since: Oct 2008, 612 posts
System specs
Sweet, more money to put towards Windows 7.

LOL! Gotta stay positive people!
  #10  
Old 06-09-2009
Guest
 
This is more like a service pack than a new OS.

It's like paying $29 for Vista SP2. So actually, Microsoft are quite a bit cheaper in this case...
  #11  
Old 06-09-2009
Guest
 
Just to add.. how is this software update conparable to windows 7? I mean Microsoft never charged anybody for any service packs.
Please dont get sucked up by the noise in the media.
windows vista is pretty stable now. and the only issue was with the manufactors drivers. vista along dind't do much wrong. also to add up look at mac os x back in the day when i started. it was WORSE dan vista. it was full of nonesense. get ur facts straight....just dont go by what u hear in the news.
  #12  
Old 06-09-2009
tengeta's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Member since: Oct 2008, 612 posts
System specs
Windows 7 is just going to be SP3 for Vista, so why is paying $399 for that more justified?

Its just like Snow Leopard, a few stability updates and yet again more eye candy.
  #13  
Old 06-11-2009
Guest
 
that's how much an os upgrade should cost not £100+, TAKE NOTE MICRO$OFT!!!
  #14  
Old 06-18-2009
Guest
 
Seems to be some misinformed people after reading their comments.
Service Packs are essentially bug fixes and patches, and they should be at no cost to the consumer. Apple uses automatic software updates in place of SPs (also at no cost), so in the end both companies do their customer base good, just in a different manner. At the end of the day does it really matter how ? Now for software versions, Mac OS X is incremented by 0.1 for each major release, so please don't tell me that Tiger (10.4) is a SP of Leopard (10.5).
Just as Vista (6.0 or 6.1) was not a SP to XP.
Snow Leopard although not bringing any major enhancements to the GUI, does offer much to the user, it will load in only 6GB of space, run faster, be optimised to the nth degree, will feature Quick Time X and make use of systems resources that much better.
This does not sound like security patches or bug fixes, but enhancements.
I should know I have been a software developer for over 23 years and know maintenance versus enhancement concepts, have any of these people leaving comments written even a line of code ever in their lives, me thinks not.
So the bottom line is this, at $29 Snow Leopard is a steel, but Windows 7, which is a very minor enhancement to Vista, what will it retail at ?
Both companies take advantage of their customer base, well that's business folks, but MS has taken illegal, morally repugnant, obnoxious and disrespectful behaviour to the maximum.
I'm fascinated why people continue to throw money at MS, with their shody technology.
  #15  
Old 07-08-2009
Guest
 
it looks great but there is still some kinks that need to be sorted out
  #16  
Old 07-08-2009
Guest
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
it looks great but there is still some kinks that need to be sorted out
everyone on this site neeeeeds to get a life
Closed Thread

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Installing Snow Leopard OSX onto an AMD system 1 The Alternative OS
Psystar brings Snow Leopard to PCs 11 TechSpot News and Comments
Snow Leopard outselling its predecessor by twofold 2 TechSpot News and Comments
Apple releases first Snow Leopard update 4 TechSpot News and Comments
News around the web: Snow Leopard upgrades for $9.95 0 TechSpot News and Comments

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.