also @ TechSpot: Nortel's internal network "owned" by hackers for almost a decade
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > TechSpot News and Comments

Begin your free trial now Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month

Intel launches first six-core desktop processor, the $999 Core i7 980X Extreme Edition

Page 1 of 5 1 2345
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-11-2010
Jos Jos is online now
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Apr 2006, 904 posts
System specs
Intel launches first six-core desktop processor, the $999 Core i7 980X Extreme Edition

Intel officially launched today its first hexa-core desktop processor, the Core i7 980X Extreme Edition. As previously reported, the codenamed Gulftown chip features six 32nm cores clocked at 3.33GHz, reaching a maximum Turbo Boost clock speed of 3.6GHz for single-threaded operations, it has a massive 12MB L3 cache, and is capable of running 12 threads simultaneously with Intel's Hyper-threading technology.

Read the whole story
__________________
Jose Vilches
Managing Editor
  #2  
Old 03-11-2010
Wagan8r's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Sep 2006, 442 posts
System specs
ME WANT!!!

ME WALLET NO WANT!!!

ARG!!!

But seriously, this processor is a nice leap in computing capacity. 12 threads of execution sounds delicious!
  #3  
Old 03-11-2010
Trillionsin's Avatar
TechSpot Addict
 
Location: Indiana, USA
Member since: Jun 2009, 687 posts
System specs
Quote:
wagan8r said:
ME WANT!!!

ME WALLET NO WANT!!!

ARG!!!

But seriously, this processor is a nice leap in computing capacity. 12 threads of execution sounds delicious!
Hahah!

I want it too, and I have a i7 950 with 4 cores. 8 virtual with hyper-threading.

...and I thought I had overkill.. is there anything that would need the new i7 980???
  #4  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Toronto, Canada
Member since: Mar 2010, 145 posts
System specs
It's good, best CPU now, but still should have a higher clock speed. In 2000 we hit the 1GHz mark. In 2004 we made it to 3.8GHz. Now 6 years later down to 3.33GHz. The power consumption is great on this thing!
  #5  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Dec 2009, 60 posts
Wow. Think about running 12 threads at the same time. But I agree with Yoda8232, lets hope they increase the clock speed.
  #6  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Seattle
Member since: Feb 2009, 1,545 posts
System specs
This is going into my purchasing queue for next spring when I do my next upgrade. :D
  #7  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Mar 2010, 31 posts
Great,,,, but first we need games and applications that take advantage of Quad core CPU's. It's all about balance you must have a great GPU with a great CPU otherwise you are spinning your wheels.
  #8  
Old 03-11-2010
BlindObject's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New Jersey
Member since: May 2007, 446 posts
So, how does it run Crysis? =D
  #9  
Old 03-11-2010
Guest
 
6 cores even a 4GHz is really not of much use to me, especially not at that price. I'd kill for a 5+GHz quad core though.
  #10  
Old 03-11-2010
PaulWuzHere's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Alabama
Member since: Jun 2005, 375 posts
System specs
YES! Now powerful computing is in the hands of everyday people. At $99.9 this is a steal... wait... oh... never mind, That was AMD.

On a serious note, what % of the market will this CPU fall in? I think these CPUs are just Intel saying "Yup we did it." Showoffs lol.

New slogan - i7 980, You'll be in debt!
  #11  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Oct 2009, 85 posts
I'll wait for AMD to make a six core processor that's half the price.
  #12  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Member since: Oct 2009, 153 posts
Saw some gaming benchmarks for this new processor, and six cores don't help at all for gaming. The games were running at pretty much the same frame rate as with the i7 975 (if I recall correctly), which is a quad core processor. So make sure your applications will benefit before buying a 6 core CPU.
  #13  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Nov 2009, 86 posts
This is basically aimed at corporate/business consumers; video editing/encoding, etc. 3D rendering, etc. and other high end uses. No consumer needs a nearly $1000.00 processor...with the state the world is in today e.g. people without even clean drinking water, I couldn't imagine spending that much on a processor...

A core i5 is plenty.
  #14  
Old 03-11-2010
Guest
 
I will stick with my 965 extreme clocked at 4Ghz But seriously I think most people would rather have a higher clock speed then 2 more cores. However this would be great for anyone that does a lot of virtualization like VMWare and Virtual PC.
  #15  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Nov 2005, 55 posts
Really are we there yet!!!

check this out in 6 months its going to be 345$ hook this un with a pair a Nvidia GTX ....... gaming at another level

strating to save money to get one ....NOW!
  #16  
Old 03-11-2010
natefalk's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Waukesha, WI
Member since: Oct 2009, 78 posts
Very impressive and I want one.

To bad I just bought a 1156 socket mobo. I'm sure in a couple years the price will be reasonable. Remember when the Core2 Quads were released? They were initially $999 and now you can get one for $200.

I can't wait for the i9's to get released.
  #17  
Old 03-11-2010
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Mar 2010, 102 posts
the specs are great! 12 threads simultaneously! dats a great deal! but we would have to take a loan to buy it! lol! seriously they should decrease the price! at $999 we can build a whole gaming rig that smoothly runs WoW! waiting for the prices to fall!
  #18  
Old 03-11-2010
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Mar 2010, 6 posts
Nice move..
i thought it won't be released this soon..
Intel is the best.. but i still like AMD more..
  #19  
Old 03-11-2010
mattfrompa's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: East Coast USA
Member since: Jul 2007, 441 posts
System specs
Quote:
seefizzle said:
I'll wait for AMD to make a six core processor that's half the price.
Yes, with 1/3 the cache, and performance more in line with Intel quad cores...
  #20  
Old 03-11-2010
princeton's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Member since: Jan 2010, 1,670 posts
System specs
+1 AMD cpus although cheap are cheap for a reason. AMD has fallen because their high end parts still get beaten by the intel i5-750.
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2345

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Intel Core i7 980X Extreme Review: An Overall Look at the Core i7 Family 10 Articles and Reviews Comments
Intel core 2 extreme QX9650 or Intel Core i7 950? 3 Processors and Motherboards
Intel Core i7 920, 940 and 965 Extreme Edition review 19 Articles and Reviews Comments
Eurocom Launches Portable Server Notebook with Intel Quad Core Xeon Processor 0 General Discussion
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 review: Quad Core is here! 7 Articles and Reviews Comments

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.