TechSpot

Phantasm66 · #1 05-16-2002

Imagine all you had to do was pay a small fee every month, say about $1, and you could download all of those mp3s, movies, and all that legally and legitimately...??? Well, read on....

Quote:

[SIZE=4]Kazaa, Verizon propose to pay artists directly[/SIZE]

By Jefferson Graham, USA TODAY

Jim Guerinot, a board member of Don Henley's and Sheryl Crow's Recording Artists Coalition and the manager of No Doubt, Beck and The Offspring, is such a fan of digital music that he has ripped his CD collection into MP3s and listens to them on his portable Apple iPod on his daily bicycle commute to work.

But you won't find any of his artists' work posted on Pressplay, the Net subscription service backed by their record labels. He removed them, he says, because the acts weren't getting paid.

The record industry has responded to the immense popularity of file-sharing — and trading of copyrighted material — by suing to close the operations down. But as one swap site shuts, others take its place, and more people are downloading now than ever.

An unlikely alliance of swap-service Kazaa and telephone and Internet giant Verizon is floating a proposal to break the logjam of lawsuits: Computer manufacturers, blank CD makers, ISPs and software firms such as Kazaa will pool funds and pay artists directly.

"Historically, there's been a clash between the content community and new technology, back to the player piano," says Verizon vice president Sarah Deutsch. "We're proposing the idea of a copyright compulsory license for the Internet, so peer-to-peer distribution would be legitimate and the copyright community would get compensation. It's hard to get the genie back in the bottle."

Kazaa lobbyist Phil Corwin says a $1-a-month fee per user on Internet providers alone (it's unclear whether costs would be passed along to subscribers) would generate $2 billion yearly: "We're talking about a modest fee on all the parties who benefit from the availability of this content."

Recording Industry Association of America president Hilary Rosen calls the proposal "the most disingenuous thing I've ever heard. It's ridiculous."

But Guerinot isn't ready to dismiss it out of hand: "Any model that starts to accommodate monetizing the artists is worth looking into."

Guerinot is upset that the labels have tried to combat technology with alternatives that have been widely rejected by the public. MusicNet and Pressplay offer limited downloads, but not in the preferred MP3 format, and they usually can't be transferred to portables or burned to CDs.

"It would be like me opening a video store, charging 10 times what others were charging and only offering videos in the Beta format," Guerinot says. "In any business, when you have billions of downloads occurring, you don't say we're going to ignore that market and try to create something else. You serve your customers."

Personally, I am in favour of anything that destroys the RIAA and all that it stands for. Its time this evil organisation with its outdated concepts was ousted away and something better put in its place.

I am a big fan and advocate of peer to peer file sharing technology. I believe that it constitutes the future of entertainment in the home. Its time that artists got more closely involved, and its time that middlemen produce-nothing-gain-everything symbols of greed and capitalism like the RIAA made way for what's really important here, art and entertainment.

The concepts of "art" and of "entertainment" predate capitalism, and even the concept of money itself. Art and entertainment have become about money. That's not going to change overnight. But what can, should and will ultimately change is how that art and entertainment is distributed and how its paid for and collected. In this age of digital media and broadband internet, the old models to which the RIAA subscribe do not apply any more, and are outdated. Its time that that changed....

You can bet your bottom dollar that I'd pay £1 a month if I thought that no one would ever stand in my way again of downloading the mp3s I want, the movies and TV eps I want.... And if I thought that that £1 was going to the artists and production houses themselves.

MrGaribaldi · #2 05-16-2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Phantasm66
You can bet your bottom dollar that I'd pay £1 a month if I thought that no one would ever stand in my way again of downloading the mp3s I want, the movies and TV eps I want.... And if I thought that that £1 was going to the artists and production houses themselves.

Hehe... I had a similar idea a little while ago, but that was more voluntary and for tv series... The idea was to be able to pay a sum, of your own choosing, to the company producing the series as thanks, since we're downloading the series without commercials...

If the system Phantasm66 talks about gets implemented, you can be sure I'll be one of the first to sign up!

I try to do something similar now, but it doesn't quite work...
I listen to music all day, but there is very few cd's which has only songs I like... So I download the songs I want, then go buy a cd as my "payment" to the artist... Why should some producer or other decide what music I'll get on my cd?

T-Shirt · #3 05-21-2002

As if Kazaa, wasn't screwed up enough, another benefit surfaces
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupda...866364,00.html

Similar Topics
Topic	Replies	Forum
Make the Location (where you live) field compulsory at signing up	28	Site Feedback and Suggestions
Ghosting PCs and XP licensing duplication?	9	Software Apps
Windows Srv 2003 Licensing	1	Windows OS
Verizon to appeal in music download ID case	1	General Discussion
Microsoft changes course on licensing	0	General Discussion

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

TechSpot

Kazaa, Verizon Propose Compulsory Music Licensing