Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.
Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync
|
|||||||
Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync
What OS should I install on my 32mb(ram) laptop
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What OS should I install on my 32mb(ram) laptop
Hi all.
I have aquired an old toshiba satalite pro laptop, I dont know what the processor speed is, but it has only 32mb ram and a 2gb harddrive, so Im guessing its fairly old. At the moment it has win2000 professional on it - which takes up 3/4 of the hard drive and eats up most of the memory. I know the laptop will never be great, but Im interested in getting it running as best as possible- mainly just for the challenge. I have been thinking of 3 routes to take: 1/ speed up win2000 by removing certain things 2/ install windows 95/98 3/ install a small version of linux I would like your advice on which would be the best route to take and basically which option would be likely to give me the best performance out of the computer - with the intention of using it as a word processor and if possible going on the internet occasionally. Many thanks in advance |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You will never make Win2k fast(er) on that thing
![]() Win 9x would prolly run OK with some lightweight word processing thing (Word 97?). Any Linux or BSD that agrees to install is OK. Just make sure you don't install GNOME, KDE or Xfce. Those are hogs. You should pick a minimal window manager like IceWM or any of the "box" series. You are better off with a less user friendy thing (Debian, Slackware, any of the BSD) that doesn't break when you don't install a whole pile of useless gadgets. AbiWord is the light word processor of choice. Web browsing.. Any usable browser will bring your system to a crawl ![]() Use OffByOne in Windows or Dillo unix if you are OK with many webpages not working and looking funny. You could use DOS.. There are WYSWYG word processors for DOS and a web browser too. Would take an enormous amount of tinkering to get it working though. Windows 3.11? All of the above applies when you want to run a GUI. You can so word processing and web browsing in a text console too, in which case any Linux would absolutely fly. Last edited by Nodsu; 11-16-2006 at 10:23 AM.. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks for the advice.
very comprehensive. And I love the offbyone browser! Im using it right now ![]() shame it hasnt got support for css - but then i guess that would defeat the object. I will do some research later on the options you gave, then Il come back here. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well... Why dont you upgrade your laptop and get Xp?
I personaly hate all the Windows OS befor Windows 2000 =P |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Timeparadox,
If only it were that easy... I do already have another laptop running XP (Dell latitude)- and I agree it is a good operating system. But thee laptop in question was given to me by a friend- origionally just to get it working as best as possible, but it has become a bit of an experiment to see how well we could get it running! |
|
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
What about Mac?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
You aren't going to get any Mac OS to run on that beast.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I say Windows 98 at best with very little programs loaded
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Last edited by Mictlantecuhtli; 12-05-2006 at 01:40 AM.. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks Mictlantecuhtli.
That looks pretty cool. I will keep that link. As for the laptop Im getting fed up of it now because its started randomly turning off and I suspect that the power jack on the board is a bit loose so maybe not much good anyway. But I will definatly use win98 lite on something!! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you want optimum performace, I would install Gentoo. There are great walkthroughs on their website on getting the install going. One the base install is complete you will want a very lightweight window manager (since gnome and kde will be memory hogs) i recommend xfce
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
You will never speed up W2K.
DOS or Linux |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Umm.. You require at least 128mb for XP and the HDD will not hold XP with other programs |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
obviously you are not familiar with many linux applications...forget ubuntu and the main stream distros...install gentoo, a lightweight window manager, and you will load faster than win 2000, applications will launch faster, and you will not have as much memory and processor being wasted
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
And you will also wait for weeks on end when emerging anything in that Gentoo
Also, if the CPU happens to be a Pentium or a 486, i686 binary packages will not work. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Damn small Linux.
|
![]() |
| Similar Topics | ||||
| Topic | Replies | Forum | ||
ATI Rage 128 bit 32mb
|
1 | Audio and Video | ||
64MB GeForce Card Shows up as 32MB
|
2 | Audio and Video | ||
32MB Geforce 256 Improvement??
|
4 | Audio and Video | ||
Antivirus & firewall to run on Windows98 with 32Mb RAM
|
4 | Virus and Malware Removal | ||
A verry weird problem with Savage4 32mb
|
0 | Audio and Video | ||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.




ATI Rage 128 bit 32mb