Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > OS & Software > Misc. Software & Utilities

2 + 2 = 7 Why in Outlook 2003?

Reply
Bookmark / Share this page
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-08-2007
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Jun 2005, 26 posts
2 + 2 = 7 Why in Outlook 2003?

Outlook 2003: In Outlook, when I right-click PERSONAL FOLDER
(then) FOLDER SIZE, the Total Size shown (incl. subfolders)
reads: 541,364 KB.

But when I go to C:\Documents and Settings\(User Name)\Local
Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folder.pst
the size (in detail view) is shown as: 1,310,409,728 (1,279,697
KB).

How can that be?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2007
cfitzarl's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: Boston, MA
Member since: Jun 2006, 2,493 posts
System specs
Not all programs are very accurate and may have not included files it doesn't recongnize or just didn't include files just becuase it didn't. I would trust Windows (assuming you have it from your file location) more than Outlook....even though it's made by the same company .
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #3  
Old 03-08-2007
jobeard's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Southern Calif.
Member since: Apr 2005, 6,614 posts
the .PST file for Outlook contains several kinds of data:
Contacts
Apointments
Task lists
Notes
and Email
The size reported by the Explorer for the ..\Outlook\Personal Folder.pst is the RAW
file size for ALL of the content managed by Outlook.

The size reported by Outlook for a specific folder is a subset of the single *.pst
file.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2007
Newcomer, in training
 
Member since: Jun 2005, 26 posts
Thanks Guys! But I have a question. Jobeard: I understand your distinction between Raw and Specific data, but when I'm in Outlook and select the ultimate parent folder, <Personal Folder.pst> by default, doesn't that include all the subfolders, including those you mention? Isn't that identical to including all the Raw data? The thing is, I've never seen this discrepancy before.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2007
jobeard's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Southern Calif.
Member since: Apr 2005, 6,614 posts
As I have Outlook 2000, my layout is different and I can't see the same thing
in the Oulook GUI left hand presentation ... this is about as far as I can take you ...
sorry

edit:
when did you last empty the Outlook trash or compress the folders?

Last edited by jobeard; 03-09-2007 at 06:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2007
tipstir's Avatar
TechSpot Guru
 
Location: USA
Member since: Jan 2006, 2,282 posts
System specs
Outlook 2003 starting to use XML format as prior 2000, 2002(XP) didn't use. You can always compact the files or move PST to different locations. This way should anything happen to your HDD you can alway have a backup on a different PC or use backup software daily. I use here as just like you would setup and Exchange Server keeping the PST in an Exchange folder off on another PC on the network. Each PC running Office 2003 and if it has Outlook 2003 can access these PST and PAB. If I run the full blow Exchange Server in SBS then it would be more idea.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hotmail and Outlook 2003 (Small Bus. Edition) - NOT Outlook Express preciousjeni Windows OS 1 10-28-2008 05:05 PM
Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003, Messages stuck symbian Misc. Software & Utilities 1 03-28-2007 09:32 PM
Outlook 2003 Jaquio Misc. Software & Utilities 0 11-09-2006 02:45 AM
outlook 2003 bhavilu2 Misc. Software & Utilities 0 10-21-2006 12:14 AM
New vulnerability in MS Outlook 2003 Spike News & Interesting links 2 05-22-2004 06:19 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.