Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.
|
|||||||
Download Now:
Rover Lands on Mars Surface
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rover Lands on Mars Surface
In the absence of computer news we are reporting that NASA's Rover has landed and sent back pictures from the surface of Mars.
![]() Image Credit: NASA. NASA's Mars rover Spirit has landed on the red planet. Within a few hours of its arrival, Spirit beamed back stunning images that elicited cheers from mission controllers. The $400 million rover is designed to conduct unprecedented geologic and photographic surveys on the Martian surface. Source: CNN.
__________________
"The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it."
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cool, landed on the third day of 2004
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's going to be interesting to see what info it can find...
Just imagine if they do find proof that there once was water on mars, and that there were life in them! (I'm talking about bacteria here, not sentient beings or anything like that!) That could mean that there is life elsewhere in our galaxy, and not just on this single planet... And it'll be interesting to see what other things it can find out about Mars... Considering how the systems has advanced since the previous missions, it might give us better insights into how a manned mission to Mars would stay at the planet... I'll stop here before I launch into incoherent ramblings about spacetravel & such
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hell, ramble on Mr. G. I enjoy the hypothetical immensely. It's good to see NASA getting back on it's collective feet again.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought they had sent some kind of ship or something there before and it broke? Oh well, good news I suppose.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good job NASA, you finally landed another probe successfully...
Last edited by vassil3427; 01-04-2004 at 05:28 PM.. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Life must have been possible on Mars. But it probably didnt happen. The theory of evolution as we know it states we were really created with the help from water, natural elements (N, O, C, etc.) and the sunlight. Mars is way far back and the light doesn't get too well over there. I think it will take a bilion years or more until the smallest form of a fraction of life can be found that originated from the planet.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not sure about your comments. You're not seeing the big picture - life not being possible on Mars is only one possibility. I don't think anyone knows enough about Mars to state something of that nature. There could be sentient aliens living under the surface watching us and staying hidden, instead of the other way around. We really have no way of knowing. But man, that is cool. Last edited by Vehementi; 01-04-2004 at 05:53 PM.. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The theory of evolution can't explain why we are here(earth), not enough time has passed by carbon dating to make it possible. Also we have yet to figure out how a single cell has been created from "nothing". untill we can create life from the elements alone, evolution is bunk. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I speak claiming I am no scientist on the planet mars nor a scientist of how life was created. There are lots of books with lots of theories of how we were to come. And reffering to just one of those theories, you can relate it.
I only have very limited knowledge on this, but I learned quite a few theories in a biology class. I'm only logically applying them with my own reasons. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll tell you what....let's all agree to meet at a pre-ordained place when we kick off and discuss it. We'll never really know the truth until then, will we?
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's not turn this into a religion vs evolution debate, that can lead to nothing but problems, besides, no one can give any tangible proof of either.
In answer to someone's earlier question, yes, I believe that NASA did send a probe to Mars in '97 or '98(not sure of the year) and it was somewhat successful in its mission which was to drive around on the surface and take pictures. I think that the power failed prematurely or something like that, but it pretty much did what it was sent to do. I also know that not long after that, they sent another one that was supposed to orbit and take pictures, it missed the planet almost completely(a slight math error in navigation I think) and a couple of others that were sent, at least one of which crashed into the planet I believe. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
What an incredible waste of money!
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
If someone still wants to argue evolution vs creationism here is a good spot to do so: http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/Ulti...assCookie=true
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well the thing is (IMO) that its not so much what we get out of going to Mars, but what we get out of pushing the technology to do that. By working on stuff to get us to Mars there are breakthroughs in other technologies that are applicable to stuff that isn't specifically space related. Its pushing the envelope rather than just being content with the technology we have avaiable now.
|
![]() |
| Similar Topics | ||||
| Topic | Replies | Forum | ||
Thorough Surface Scan Utilities?
|
3 | Storage and Networking | ||
Mars rover sending data again
|
4 | General Discussion | ||
NASA loses contact with Mars rover
|
7 | General Discussion | ||
NASA Gets New Signals From Mars Rover
|
2 | General Discussion | ||
Turn any flat surface to a speaker...
|
5 | General Discussion | ||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.




Thorough Surface Scan Utilities?