also @ TechSpot: Updated Microsoft EULA prohibits class action lawsuits

TechSpot
Register now for a live online demo to see how the Office 365 suite of tools
- professional email, calendars, video conferencing, and file sharing -

250Gb hdd PATA or 160Gb hdd SATA 150

Discussion in 'Storage and Networking' started by eijmaster1, May 13, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

  1. eijmaster1 Newcomer, in training

    I currently have a 250 Gb ATA HDD and I'm wondering if I should put my newly aquired 160 SATA, or if I should replace the 250 with the 160. I skeptical cuz another HDD will add more heat and take up more power. It is possible to have both though. Should I try both and see what happens? What do you guys think?

    Antec 430W 2x12v
    4 HDD's = 1x Sata (120Gb = XP), 3x Pata (80Gb = Vista, 2x 250Gb Stuff)
    eijmaster1, May 13, 2008
    #1

  2. SNGX1275 TechSpot Special Forces

    That 160 isn't going to be any faster than your 250. Likely slower.

    Yes its possible to use both, and I would do so.
    SNGX1275, May 13, 2008
    #2

  3. eijmaster1 Newcomer, in training

    I thought Sata was faster? Can someone please move this to "Storage and Networking"?
    eijmaster1, May 13, 2008
    #3

  4. SNGX1275 TechSpot Special Forces

    SATA in theory is faster, in practice, the physical hard drive capabilities are the limiting factor. That, and the 250 being newer than the 160 makes me think that the 250 is going to be faster.

    and yeh I'll move it.
    SNGX1275, May 13, 2008
    #4

  5. eijmaster1 Newcomer, in training

    Oh ok cool. Yeah I did some benchmarking and they're about the same. Only real dif was the access time. Thanx.
    eijmaster1, May 13, 2008
    #5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.