hahahanoobs
Posts: 5,226 +3,077
I think he was referring to this one: https://www.canadacomputers.com/product_info.php?cPath=43_557_558&item_id=163066
I saw it. The cheapest 1660 Ti is still $339, with lots others on sale very near that.
I think he was referring to this one: https://www.canadacomputers.com/product_info.php?cPath=43_557_558&item_id=163066
Lol, this doesn't counter anything I said.
I can link cards and quote comments but its pretty easy to see them.
16% of steam gamers used Radeons, thats all you need to know.
Ouch.
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 5700 XT 100416P8GL Video Card - Newegg.com
Buy SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB GDDR6 PCI Express 4.0 x16 ATX Video Card 100416P8GL with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Once you know, you Newegg!www.newegg.com
I could quote these all day, 25% are 3 star or lower on the first GPU I looked at, but 16% of Steam gamers is really all you need to know. Isn't the truth a pain in the ***?
Yeah, its ok.
If Radeons were priced much lower to make up for thier inferior software and and more issues, they wouldn't be at a pitiful 16% of steam users.
There's some facts for you.
I can't wait to hear your argument, see more links to Nvidia issues and some comment about how their the same..please, enlighten me!
AAhhhhhhahahahaaha!
16%.Cherry picking results from a single card proves nothing,
16%.
There is no argument, no angle, no quote and no data you can use to argue the absolute truth about those cards and their software, you just end up looking like the biased AMD fool you are, again.
AMD being used by 16% of steam users and has a pitiful 20% of discrete GPU market share is all you need to know.
End of discussion.
They need to be priced cheaper to make up for thier shortcomings, and Steam gamers...in fact, all gamers, know this.
Nvidia isn't perfect, but they are FAR better, which is why they have 80% of the discrete GPU share, and are used by 84% of Steam users.
Live in denial all you want and pretend they are just as good as one another, just don't confuse that with the truth and god forbid, turn a blind eye to those ridiculously one sided numbers...which are one sided for a reason.
This is so obvious only a fanboy would argue against those numbers. If it was the other way around you wouldn't see me saying Nvidia was as good as AMD, I wouldn't dare say anything so foolish and glaringly stupid. Not trying to be harsh...jeesh I can't remember the last time you won a debate against me now...starting to feel bad Eve.
I know your not that dumb.
16%.
There is no argument, no angle, no quote and no data you can use to argue the absolute truth about those cards and their software, you just end up looking like the biased AMD fool you are, again.
AMD being used by 16% of steam users and has a pitiful 20% of discrete GPU market share is all you need to know.
End of discussion.
They need to be priced cheaper to make up for thier shortcomings, and Steam gamers...in fact, all gamers, know this.
Nvidia isn't perfect, but they are FAR better, which is why they have 80% of the discrete GPU share, and are used by 84% of Steam users.
Live in denial all you want and pretend they are just as good as one another, just don't confuse that with the truth and god forbid, turn a blind eye to those ridiculously one sided numbers...which are one sided for a reason.
This is so obvious only a fanboy would argue against those numbers. If it was the other way around you wouldn't see me saying Nvidia was as good as AMD, I wouldn't dare say anything so foolish and glaringly stupid. Not trying to be harsh...jeesh I can't remember the last time you won a debate against me now...starting to feel bad Eve.
I know your not that dumb.
The steam survey also shows simplified Chinese jumping by over 14% in a single month and is now sitting at a 37.87%. That's higher then English which is at 30.43%.
I guess game developers should be using Chinese as the primary language they make their games for! Makes sense if you actually believe steam's survey numbers are an accurate representation of what people who buy games own. I wonder why most games don't, what reason could they ever have?? That same survey has 1/3rd of people with a screen below 1080p. Totally normal (even though you can't even buy monitors lower then 1080p unless you are looking used). In case you missed it, that was sarcasm.
See this is the problem with presenting what you perceive as an infallible argument. It is all too easy to point out things in the steam survey that most certainly don't represent real life.
... Now let the fights begin and tell other people what they should buy based on the games only I play!
Hilarious these discussions about vRAM. It's like those years ago when they started to release 4GB models of cards instead of 2GB cards and people were sure that 4GB could never be used. Even then The Elder Scrolls was mentioned as example and hundreds of comments and trolling commences ;D
Good times, good times ;D
It's fun that it only matters when you don't have enough. For some people this is always the case if they play heavily modded game, in other cases it doesn't matter at all. Now let the fights begin and tell other people what they should buy based on the games only I play!
May be worth checking the 2060 KO reviews (TPU has one).
If a 2060 were on my shopping list, I'd definitely go for the FE instead of the "El cheapo" edition that's using RTX 16xx series cooling (as compared to the 5600 XT which has the same cooling solution as the next better model).
With a 1660 series PCB and hsf and four phase vrm...Well, if you watch the Gamers Nexus video from yesterday, you'd learn that EVGA's RTX 2060 KO has a different GPU die from the typical RTX 2060. It is in fact actually an RTX 2080 in disguise.
Actually 1920x1080 isnt 2kIts 2020 and mainstream is still on 2k aka 1920x1080
surly 2.5k aka 2560x1440 should be mainstream now.
Jimbo,
Your two post were good here thanks for adding in your two cents. Nice to see unbias logical points.
Actually 1920x1080 isnt 2k
2k would be something like 2048x1536 4:3 or 2048x1440 16:10 (if that exists) since its a category
...
Yea, except Navi is 12+ months newer and on 7nm process. NVIDIA hasn't even moved to 7nm and Navi is still trying to fight against their now 2 years old cards line up. I don't see how that's epic fail, except for consumers. It's almost 3 years since the GTX 1080 Ti release and almost 4 years since GTX 1080 release and here we are, still mostly concerned about cards around those old cards performance level. We should have cards that are twice as fast (100% faster) than GTX 1080 for the same release price by now ($600). Four years! I'm hoping the big Navi and NVIDIA 7nm Ampere actually bring some serious performance increase because, ffs RTX 2080 Ti is still not much of an improvement over Pascal for twice the asking price.nVidia can not compete with AMD's new NAVI.
nVidia has tried, but they can not match AMD's price/performance ratio, nor can they match AMD's gaming technology. nVidia had to re-brand their whole entire "RTX" line up, and reduce prices in their GTX sku's, just to stay relevant..!
2060 Super = $399
5700xt = $379
5700 = $329
5600xt = $279
AMD's 5700 beats the rtx2060 SUPER in many games. nVidia = epic fail
Yea, except Navi is 12+ months newer and on 7nm process. NVIDIA hasn't even moved to 7nm and Navi is still trying to fight against their now 2 years old cards line up. I don't see how that's epic fail, except for consumers. It's almost 3 years since the GTX 1080 Ti release and almost 4 years since GTX 1080 release and here we are, still mostly concerned about cards around those old cards performance level. We should have cards that are twice as fast (100% faster) than GTX 1080 for the same release price by now ($600). Four years! I'm hoping the big Navi and NVIDIA 7nm Ampere actually bring some serious performance increase because, ffs RTX 2080 Ti is still not much of an improvement over Pascal for twice the asking price.