Care to explain wtf is second most popular AMD graphic card? That is:
AMD Radeon Graphics
FYI, AMD has not released product named "AMD Radeon Graphics" so far...
AMD Radeon Graphics means all AMD cards that have to low a presence in the data for a more specific named entry. Like for example the 3090 has enough numbers for its own entry. Thus we see the 3090 in its own named entry.
The 6900xt is not their as its own entry because there are too few in the data. So they are part of the AMD Radeon Graphics entry. Thus gamers have rejected the AMD 6000 series and developers should ignore it in developing new software.
FSR in its current from cant upscale from 1080p to 4k. Image quality is just tooo poor. Unreal Engine is making this a standard. Thus because of this FSR in its current form is DoA. Also AMD DXR performance is too poor for future Photo real games. AMD DXR support uses shaders for some RT processing and nvidia use dedicated hardware. AMD uses there texture cores for RT processing and you cant use both at the same time. NVidia have dedicated hardware.
AMD's RDNA2 chips contain one Ray Accelerator per CU, which is similar to what Nvidia has done with it's RT cores. Even though AMD sort of takes the same approach as Nvidia, the comparison between AMD and Nvidia isn't clear cut. The BVH algorithm depends on both ray/box intersection calculations and ray/triangle intersection calculations. AMD's RDNA2 architecture can do four ray/box intersections per CU per clock, or one ray/triangle intersection per CU per clock.
From our understanding, Nvidia's Ampere architecture can do up to two ray/triangle intersections per RT core per clock, plus some additional extras, but it's not clear what the ray/box rate is. In testing, Big Navi RT performance generally doesn't come anywhere close to matching Ampere, though it can usually keep up with Turing RT performance. That's likely due to Ampere's RT cores doing more ray/box and ray/triangle intersections per clock.
This is why drivers wont improve AMD's performance. Its the hardware that is slower. No matter what, with raster on its way out. In future current NVidia cards will perform better in newer AAA RT games than AMD.
For cards over a £1000 or $1364.03 you want them to last as long as possible. In current DXR games AMD are already on the ropes. When the DXR games designed for the performance of current NVidia hardware appear. Then AMD's 6000 series will have to be replaced. Not even the top cards will have enough performance for decent gameplay. The more you strip the die down and move down the product line. You find DXR support on AMD becomes next to unless, as the performance is not there. You cant use a DLSS feature to go from 1080p to 4k RT in Cybepunk 2077 using a low end RTX 2060 like GPU. AMD cant upscale from 1080p to 4k the FSR quality is just not there. Basically DLSS performance mode is better than all FSR quality modes. You should see the quality drop if you use third party software to add FSR to cyberpunk 2077. Its nowhere even close to DLSS for quality.
This is why steam hardware survey gpu has no entries for the best AMD cards. NVidia has a massive performance lead.
