TechSpot

Are Facebook games making more money than traditional games?

By Emil
Feb 4, 2011
Post New Reply
  1. Facebook games aren't tracked in terms of sales, so it's difficult to find accurate revenue estimates. Nevertheless, since more game companies are going social, IGN decided to put together a graphic to see how much revenue social titles are bringing in.

    Read the whole story
  2. Kibaruk

    Kibaruk TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,237   +79

    I'm hating where gaming trends are going... with all my heart...
  3. yRaz

    yRaz TS Booster Posts: 907   +94

    I would like to see more accurate numbers, but it is interesting...or disappointing. I'm gonna say more disappointing than interesting, though.
  4. veedubguy

    veedubguy TS Rookie Posts: 25

    And this is why more game companies are taking on the prospect of doing more free 2 play w/ micro transactions... unfortunately I think this might become the future of gaming.
  5. Julio Franco

    Julio Franco TechSpot Editor Posts: 6,534   +316

    It'd be interesting to know how accurate these figures really are, but when you come to think about it, it's not just about the quality of the games anymore but accessibility seems as important. For "standard" games that means better distribution (including digital), less draconian anti-piracy measures and pricing.
  6. Benny26

    Benny26 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,575   +47

    It wouldn't be surprising if they were. It's very saddening.
  7. I could be wrong, but shouldn't Starcraft 2 be somewhere on that list?
  8. TomSEA

    TomSEA TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 2,347   +397

    Kinda crazy - no doubt those FB games are making a brazillion dollars. BUT...it's an apples and oranges thing. The people I know who play those games are 1) primarily ladies (of all ages) and 2) non-traditional gamers.

    Like when the Wii came out. All of us traditional gamers laughed at the corny Wii motion controllers and cartoonish looking games. But then they outsold the XBox and PS3 by a ton. And to who? Non-traditional gamers and young families.

    It's just a different market. Not good, not bad - just different. The only commonality is they are labeled as "computer games."
  9. Starcraft might not be supposed to be there - but WoW certainly should.
  10. Kibaruk

    Kibaruk TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,237   +79

    Amazing point Cota... you could laugh the same without wasting internet space you know...

    Starcraft 2 sold when it was new, now it keeps selling but not as Black Ops as an example, also have in mind that shooters are more easy than strategy games that are for more hardcore players (trying to label as something).

    I read something interesting there that I havent thought of, more accesible less RMA and that crap, although I really dont like where this is going because there are starting to come out games where you are required to pay for more things.

    For example DLC, when they used to be free and a way to keep the game fresh and make more people buy the game, now they sell those so you invest more and more money into the game. Just wait for those online will always get something out of you, maybe you wont pay monthly fees but you'll still want to get that sword of devastateallyoucanswingthisat or that gun fireinstagibshotswithheadautoaiming or what not.
  11. Tedster

    Tedster Techspot old timer..... Posts: 10,074   +13

    I play of lot of facebook games as well as regular games and my wife and I have been known to drop a few bucks here and there. Yes, they're cheesy, but they are fun and games are all about entertainment and having fun.
     
  12. hitech0101

    hitech0101 TS Enthusiast Posts: 427   +19

    Online gaming addiction is far worse than gaming addiction facebook introducing simple games is just getting more addicted people to play with other users on facebook.
  13. Johny47

    Johny47 TS Rookie Posts: 157

    I don't really care, if people want to waste their money away on completely crap and probably repetitive games(those facebook ones sound as repetitive as some 'next gen' games really are =/) then their choice.
  14. zillion

    zillion TS Rookie Posts: 51

    The problem here as i see it and which, if ive read it correctly, others also notice is that if the micro-transition system becomes a too big a succes it will transfer itself to other games aswell, we might see it as greedy companies but u have to remember that if a company should fall behind in marketshare/stockprice it will eventually go to the eternal gamefields or bought by another of those, at that time stronger micro-transition companies, so evcentually we and i say we as a pc community, will be lost.
    So for a certain extend i see why dlc´s reguire a small fee these days, i dont argue that the current amount is the right for those dlc´s and in some cases seems quite overpriced considering Activision/Blizzard entertainment have earned there share the last couple of years. But never the less i do like Activision/blizzard being one of the major players as they create pc games.

    On another note, am i the only one thinking its utter **** that a game can win "Game of the year" without being distributed for ps3, xbox AND pc??
  15. Lokalaskurar

    Lokalaskurar TS Enthusiast Posts: 616

    Welcome to the club...

    I keep remembering a picture seen on google, with all major game-protagonists war-posing (i.e. Gordon Freeman, Commander Shepard, Jake Dunn etc.) and the comment:

    True Gaming
    Because we're not Facebook-farmers.
  16. interesting.. noone from my contacts who playing zynga games dosnt spend single one dolar in to it.. nr of playing vs money must be in bigger difference.. i dont trust in this kind of study!
  17. Benny26

    Benny26 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,575   +47

    I might have to track that picture down and change my wallpaper.
  18. mattfrompa

    mattfrompa TS Maniac Posts: 481   +8

    Despite all of this, I'm still gaming more than ever before and I like the direction the games I play are going. I'm currently addicted to: Dead Space 2(xbox 360) Starcraft 2 and League of Legends (PC). It is sad to see what we perceive as being lower quality titles outshining the better ones. But so far I'm still more than able to spend too much time playing games. I honestly think there are enough people involved in the gaming industry that care about making truly innovative titles that I am not too worried. Although I do fear we will have to tread through an increasing amount of garbage to find games that are worthwhile.
  19. WoW definitely should be on that list. Yeah, it's a bit different type of game, but it's not like the games on the list are all similar either.

    For the amount of sales, it'd combat with CoD:BO with just active subscriptions, and for revenue generated it'd beat all the games on the list. As for actual profit, who knows what that is, but then the list is revenue-based instead profit-based anyway.

    I myself don't play any of the Facebook games. They're just... silly. Like kid's games or whatever. Honestly stupidly popular for such simplistic, boring games. Each to their own though - my mother plays several of them with no less than three different accounts. Multiboxing Facebook moms - where has to world come to?


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.