First thats not what he said:
He is denying that it is actually optimized for multi core, not true.
secondly, check the hardware survey's quad cores are quite pervasive, lots of people have them.
Thirdly, check the many reviews that include CPU scaling (cores) you will see that almost all games run better on more than one core.
Fourthly, You have not read many game reviews lately, more and more of them are using more than two,three, and yes more than 4 cores (see BC2)
Here is a benchmark going back a year and a half ago with a dated Q6660 and a GS 250 card. see the huge jump from 1-2-3 cores?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280-11.html
and how do you explain this?...same GPU being used, the only difference is the number of cores and the CPU frequency.
okay, plug in a single core in its place and see what happens.
Huh?
ya think?
again, what do you think feeds your GPU subsystem? and most games scale with CPU cores and frequency.
A large majority?
anyway, check your hardware surveys
and one more time, he was asserting that they cannot, and are not optimized for more than a single core, and that it does not make a difference because the GPU is running the whole show...obviously not.
I do do every day, If I was only giving the gamers two cores for games today...I would be out of business. If you are a gamer, and have more than two cores, you should log your CPU while you play... what you find may surprise you.
If its so overwhelmingly GPU dependent, why do you need to have equal or "matched up" GPU/CPU?[/QUOTE]
i was wrong about most games using only 2 cores, but it still doesn't make much of a difference for most people in the performance of the game. why u ask? good question.
lets say 10% of people know how to balance their gpus and cpu to maximize the performance of each.
45% of people have comps that have a better gpu and 45% have a better cpu.
of the 45% that have a better gpu, half(22.5%) have intel processors.
of the 22.5% without intel processors, half(11.25%) dont have enough ram.
45% have a better cpu = doesn't help the performance much, if at all because the cpu already out performs the gpu
22.5% with intel processors = intel cpus have hyper threading and turbo boost. as more threads r used, the cpu is overclocked(turbo boost) less. as less threads r used, the cpu is overclocked more. because of turbo boost, u only get significant improvement if the gpu is much stronger than the cpu.
11.25% with too little ram = the limited amount of ram is limiting performance, improving the cpu wont help much until u improve the ram.
so around 5-15% get good performance boosts from this update.(this is an estimation because i dont know the actual statistics for alot of variables i just used 50% to try to keep it even)
most game engines are heavily reliant on the GPU. the only CPU based engine i can think of is the source engine. in other words having a crap CPU will be better than having a crap GPU(i never said that having a bad cpu wont affect performance, i just said it will make less of an impact than having a bad gpu). I DO NOT DENY THAT USING A 1 CORE CPU WILL KILL PERFORMANCE. i dont know y u keep assuming that.
u use a matched gpu/cpu because it u get to maximize performance and save money(u save money because u dont buy an overly powerful, and expensive, component that wont even be fully utilized).