A lot can happen in four years, especially in the world of PCs. But how much better is one of the latest GPUs compared to an architecture from a few years back? Well, read on to find out how one person's upgrade choice all panned out.
A lot can happen in four years, especially in the world of PCs. But how much better is one of the latest GPUs compared to an architecture from a few years back? Well, read on to find out how one person's upgrade choice all panned out.
All that said, I don't think there's going to be any paradigm-shifting change in the market prices for GPUs any time soon (if at all) and I don't really care what it's called. Nvidia could have named it the RTX Slartibartfast for all I care -- it was the feature set and performance uplift that mattered, and both of those were comfortably within the price bracket I was willing to accept.
Despite being over two years old, something like a GeForce RTX 3080 10GB is still very capable and can be found new in the UK for around £700.
No, because that's more than I'd be comfortable paying for a graphics card these days. Not that would I ever replace a 4070 Ti with a card that only has a performance uplift of around 25%.So, you're totally OK to pay, say, 1099$ for 6050Ti if it does the same 4080 does?
Steve's testing shows an 8% performance improvement and my own was reasonably in line with that, so for gaming alone, it's not really worth it. Besides, as I pointed out, if the Radeon had better support for, and with, the software I use frequently, then it would have been up for consideration.Unless you can't afford another 60-70£ without defaulting on rent or car payment or food... seems like mininal money for another 15% performance improvement vs 4070ti.
Okay then, 5 years later, 899$ for 7050 faster than 4090?No, because that's more than I'd be comfortable paying for a graphics card these days. Not that would I ever replace a 4070 Ti with a card that only has a performance uplift of around 25%.
The 4070ti isn't a bad product, it's just priced stupid.A lad I know upgraded from a zotac twin edge 3060 12GB to a 4070ti, he actually managed to bag one for £799 on launch day. He's over the moon with it and upgraded his 1080p monitor for a 3440x1440 144Hz monitor and says it maxes all the games out he plays at a locked 144fps with only Cod Warzone occasionally dipping to around 100fps.
People need to realise, it's not progress if you get 50% more performance for 50% more cost. That's the very definition of stagnation. Yeah so a 6050 Ti at any price north of $399 is simply !diotic no matter what the performance in 3 years. Nvidia is one of the only companies on earth that thinks technological progress is measured in $$ to their bottom line, not in providing better performance for the same money.So, you're totally OK to pay, say, 1099$ for 6050Ti if it does the same 4080 does?
Isn't the problem about pricing ?I really wish this test had included the 3080 for a much more rounded look at the differences in the last three gens...
I know the point is "Going From 20 to 40" but why not give a picture of all three, since it affects so many of us?
Only those with a 20xx class card, or older, should be even contemplating paying these new greed driven prices that Nvidia have shoved down everyone's throats.
No... the article is a performance comparison between the 20xx and 40xx series.Isn't the problem about pricing ?
Yes, it would have been useful but this was my money, not a review loan situation. If I actually had a 3080, I definitely wouldn't be upgrading it to a 4070 Ti.I really wish this test had included the 3080 for a much more rounded look at the differences in the last three gens...
I know the point is "Going From 20 to 40" but why not give a picture of all three, since it affects so many of us?
That's not new though. Upgrading from the previous immediate generation has always been an objective waste of cash, unless were going back 20 years to the DX6 era. .Well it certainly shows that unless you're going 'all in' and getting a 4090, upgrading from any 30xx class card is a total waste of money.
Only those with a 20xx class card, or older, should be even contemplating paying these new greed driven prices that Nvidia have shoved down everyone's throats.
People also need to realize that inflation is a thing. Nvidia's gross margin today is 7% higher (57%) then it was in 2011. Chips cost a lot more, components cost a lot more. Only during peak gouge did nvidia hit 65% margin.People need to realise, it's not progress if you get 50% more performance for 50% more cost. That's the very definition of stagnation. Yeah so a 6050 Ti at any price north of $399 is simply !diotic no matter what the performance in 3 years. Nvidia is one of the only companies on earth that thinks technological progress is measured in $$ to their bottom line, not in providing better performance for the same money.
4070 Ti is $200US over the odds and 4080 is $400 over the odds. AMD is also gouging on the 7900XT by around $200 as it is really the 6800XT replacement. Incoming 7800XT will be 6700XT replacement at 6800XT pricing and so on.
Stuff the inane censoring BTW mods.