I think if Chrome can push out a extension base I would switch to it. It is a much faster browser. I just can't go day to day without a "real" ad-block and noscript. plus all the other little customizations I like to run.

this reminds me of Firefox and its addons. Nice attempt of Google to tap into the power of the pool of developers out there, nonetheless!!

I wonder if Chrome has come to the party too late with the ability to build extensions. Firefox extensions are so numerous that you can pretty much find something to suit your needs.

Let's see what happens.

Agrees with @paynetrain007 again. All I need on my browser is a way to block ads. But really... would google "trust" a tester that built an ad-blocker into a Chrome extension? I wonder. Will keep my eyes peeled on what the google comes up with. Maybe then I'll consider Chrome again.

I would definitely consider switching if proper Adblock and Noscript alternatives were made available - the other extensions I use I could live without. Then again, I look forward to see what Firefox 4 has to offer.

I've been kinda interested in using Chrome, but I'm not a big fan of start-up open source. Well...what I mean is that, I'm probably going to give it a try, but not yet. I just hope it lives up to all the hype I've heard over it.

If in the end it turns out that their addons are just as good or better than those from firefox then we might see many people migrate to Chrome (i'll probably use both). But until then we might actually see FF4.0 role out. (FF 3.6 is already receiving some good reviews)

I guess we'll have to wait and see how these extensions affect the speed of Chrome, after all speed is the reason for using Chrome in the first place. If adding a theme, adblock and some other extensions slows it down noticeably, then you might as well use firefox with its huge add-on collection.

It will take a lot for google to grab firefox users. I'm really interested in the google OS, however.

The extensions are good and all..but it'll probably effect chromes speed, which is the reason why most people that use it primarily are using it. I'd much rather stick with firefox anyways...google is already big enough, it doesn't need to compete in browsers imo.

I've been running Chrome of the Dev channel for a while now and I love the extensions that I installed. I've got Adblock+, Flashblock and even RSS.

If you want to try them out before the beta, switch to the dev channel here:
http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel

and extensions are already available here:
http://www.chromeextensions.org/

I would think about trying Chrome if it had the popular add-ons, or similar alternatives, that Firefox has, such as Adblock Plus. But, if Chrome extensions cause noticeable drops in the speed of the browser there would be very little reason to make the switch.

I wonder if Chrome OS, being browser based will have extensions too

It would probably have many extensions if you ask me, because it is open source now.

It would probably have many extensions if you ask me, because it is open source now.

I am already sold with the Chrome + Adblock. I just hope they can roll out a similar GreaseMonkey addon.

I use Opera most of the time. The only time I use Firefox is when I go to an internet cafe where they don't have Opera. So this thingy about plug-ins and extensions is new to me. I try to be unique since Firefox is used by virtually everybody.

I'm on a portable version of Google Chrome, distributed by portableapps I'm using the Dev version too, I know there isn't much extension for Chrome yet but I'm quite impressed with what out there so far. But the thing is my chrome toolbar is cluttered.

Good luck on chrome, it's always been my favorite browser