Intel finds design flaw in Sandy Bridge chipset

Jos

Posts: 3,073   +97
Staff

Intel has warned of a flaw with the 6 Series chipset, code-named Cougar Point, that accompanies its latest Sandy Bridge processors, which gradually degrades the performance of the SATA ports over time and thus affects the speed of hard drives and optical drives. In a statement put out this morning, the company attributed the problem to a design issue and said it expects the cost to repair and replace the chip to be around $700 million -- a recall notice should follow soon.

The faulty chip has been out since January 9, so at least it seems Intel has caught the issue early and stopped all shipments. Furthermore the company says it already has corrected the design issue and will deliver an updated version of the chipset in late February with full volume coming in April, but systems will likely be in short supply for now.

It's worth noting there are no flaws in Sandy Bridge processors themselves. For computer makers and other Intel customers that have bought potentially affected chipsets or systems, Intel says it will work with its OEM partners to accept the return of the affected chipsets and support modifications or replacements needed.

Permalink to story.

 
Well it's nice to know they aren't trying to pass it off as something like a software issue or whatever.

*wink wink*
 
So I take it this is a material / manufacturing issue rather than an architectural issue?
 
red1776 said:
So I take it this is a material / manufacturing issue rather than an architectural issue?

I think so. Because the statement on their site says that it was only chipsets manufactured after...I think it was January 9.
 
Good to know this seems to be more of a QC issue than a design flaw. Have to wonder if it was a real breakdown on the manufacturing side, or if it was missed in the mad dash to hit the market hard and steal AMD's Fusion thunder?
 
Hope they will buy me some thermal paste too for reseating my H50 cooler after switching the motherboard out :S
 
Hope they will buy me some thermal paste too for reseating my H50 cooler after switching the motherboard out :S

Isn't the thermal paste on the h50 pre applied? Sorry to hear you'll have to replace it, factory applied is as evenly spread as it gets.
 
princeton said:
Hope they will buy me some thermal paste too for reseating my H50 cooler after switching the motherboard out :S

Isn't the thermal paste on the h50 pre applied? Sorry to hear you'll have to replace it, factory applied is as evenly spread as it gets.

you cheapskate, get some alcohol, clean that *****, and take $5 and buy some better thermal that aint only good for one use.
 
Wait so does this mean i'll have to replace the new p67 motherboard i just bought? and does that mean i'll have to reinstall windows again?
 
i almost bought the ASUS P67 Deluxe and 2600K today. Thank you TechSpot!!!
Coolermaster Gold 1000w and GTX 570 is still on!
 
Wait so does this mean i'll have to replace the new p67 motherboard i just bought? and does that mean i'll have to reinstall windows again?


The way it reads, if you are in possession of a P67, it's faulty. If they issue you the same motherboard you should not have to. I believe the hardware identifiers will be the same.
 
As others have said, at least Intel have stood up to the mark and are prepared to take the financial hit to keep there reputation.

I do wonder if it could have been avoided however.
 
"I do wonder if it could have been avoided however."

That's hard to say. I work right next to our QA department and it seems like no matter how long or extensive the testing, something always gets through. And of course, we all know how buggy (in general) software releases are no matter how much they test. There's no way they can account for every single hardware/OS configuration in the world when testing software. Whether hardware or software, sometimes you just gotta release it to the masses and keep your fingers crossed that if any bugs show up they'll be quick fixes for the problem.

I give props to Intel for owning up to as soon as they could and taking immediate corrective steps.
 
By the sound of things, degradation ranges between 5% for casual users to 15% for heavier users. At least Intel came out with it now, as opposed to sitting on it and hoping nobody notices.

If I were in possession of a P67 board, I'd probably wait a while before replacing my 'faulty' board; everyone's going to be madly returning their boards. Unless you're a power user that needs all the speed you can get, this problem isn't that terrible.
 
I'm not worried about my P67 board since in 3 yrs. I'll deffinately have a different board anyway
 
Princeton said:
Well it's nice to know they aren't trying to pass it off as something like a software issue or whatever.

*wink wink*

Orange and Pear would never do that. * annoying laugh >:3*
 
Excellent news that they found it and didn't sweep stuff like this under the rug. God forbid a company releases a defective product and didn't do anything but bump up the warranty to 3 years.
 
The issue may be more serious than Intel is willing to admit or it may be simply what the company has stated in its press release. Either way, this gives more time to plan my next PC upgrade.
 
Back