Love this review. The truth is...everyone wants a quad core pc. Dont lie, yeah I'm looking at you too. Well maybe not everyone, but for those of us that build are more often than ever(pre 2007 when "dual core" was dominant) wanting more out of our computers. To make a review with a specific price point is/was a great idea for people jumping into the multi core pc market. So again, great read and review.

Geezus your mean! :haha::wave:

anyway great review. the quad core market just more exciting and it seems that quad computing is on the verge of actually arriving. im accumulating parts for an i7 build, and setting aside $$ to snap up four of the DX11 cards this fall......oh yes, and waiting for some benchmarks....(ahem)^

Yea yeah Red I know. I'm on a netbook as we speak, working on reassembling my desktop with vertex ssd's a new case and flashy lights.

Best bang for the buck (IMO)

Intel Core I7 CPU's

This one is $299 Intel Core i7 860 Lynnfield 2.8GHz

This one is $279 Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz

These prices will fall. There are many good deals popping up lately on these CPU's

Next step down would be the Core 2 Quad series

http://www.compusa.com/applications/Category/category_slc.asp?CatId=2758

LOL , just givin ya the needle

I thought you hated flashy lights!

glad you brought that up, are those the best?, and what case did you decide on?

Sorry, I was not aware of the article. I was only responding to Julio's question (thread). I was also not aware of the Core i5. I will read more about it.

Brilliant review. Hope the i5 releases in India soon. Will definitely make it my first preference when building my friend's rig later this month.

That's where I got it for my son's computer. I expected the new line-up to come out and screw me royally price-wise but wanted to build a computer in time for my son's birthday. I'm, personally, now looking at the i5 for my main machine.

the best bang for the buck right now is still the Q6600. overclockable up to 4ghz with a mere $180 price tag, not to mention what really makes it the bang is the low price of DDR2 (you can easily get total of 8gigs of them for dirt cheap), and a decently priced P45 mobo.

Don't mean to hijack the thread. I OC'd my Q6600 to a modest 3.0Ghz with a cheap cooler (slightly better than stock). I only increased FSB to 333 and didnt mess with any other settings. Running on a Asus P5K-VM Mobo with integrated graphics. What other settings would I change to go higher speed? Isn't 4Ghz kind of stretching it? What type of cooling would you use to OC it to 4Ghz.

it all depends on the temperature of your overclock and the quality of your mobo. when the above two are satisfied, all that limits your speed is the quality of the cpu silicon and the amount of patience you have. from the looks of your specs, you're limited by both of these factors. you need at least a Xigmatek S1283 heatsink or equivalent, and a quality mobo like an Asus P5Q Deluxe or Gigabyte P45 UD3P. these are just the two major factors (aside from speed of your ram, and quality of your power supply).
4Ghz is a bit of a strech for most general public, but not for a water cooled setup. I've got two Q6600 at home one does 3.5ghz while the other at 4Ghz. the one @ 4Ghz requires water and voltage of 1.5v to the core. but with decent air cooler, it does 3.5~3.6ghz easy.
most of the Q6600 G0 stepping are well capable of 3.4ghz and above, so it's really a good deal consider how cheap DDR2 and P45 mobo is.

One benchmark I would like to see with these processors is a video encoding or DVD ripping test, using a software like Handbrake. I'm interested in seeing if hyperthreading would have any significant benefits there, as those processes are highly thread-able.

I'd like to see how the much more expensive 9xx Intel series CPUs faired, just for comparison sake.
I'm still satisfied with my E8400 dual core rig, waiting as long as possible before upgrading, atm.
I was on newegg and several users said these aren't a big upgrade from good dual cores, and QX6600's.
If upgrading from lower, definitely go for it, however! 8)
Regular hard drives are still holding Windows back, no surprise really, damn resource piggy.

Sir very nice review I totally agree with it except the pricing Point of view. You yourself have posted the link of AM3 motherboard , please look once I saw a $77 AM3 based Mb then why you have only included $180 while you have given a price range in i5 segment .?

Please edit it as it creates FUD. a 400$ system for Phenom II with top of the line CPU makes more sense http://techspot.pricegrabber.com/search_attrib.php?form_keyword=AM3&topcat_id=&Search=Go&page_id=40&st=filter-query

Edit : Just a $60 Am2+ Mb in which Am3 based processor will work http://techspot.pricegrabber.com/search_getprod.php/masterid=728644330/search=AM3/st=product/sv=title

There is plethora of options there why you only included $180 Mb ?

Regards