Mark Zuckerberg seeks to avoid personal liability in social media addiction lawsuits

[Endymio]

I don't need to explain how wrong you are because the shear [sic] number of officers of companies currently sitting in prison

Oops again! You failed to read my post: I noted you're confusing criminal and civil law. This is a case about civil liability. You claimed a "mountain" of case law exists where officers of public corporations have faced personal civil liability for the official acts of their company. I invite you to name one. Just one. Until then, you're blathering in the wind.

 

[ZedRM]

Oops again! You failed to read my post: I noted you're confusing criminal and civil law. This is a case about civil liability. You claimed a "mountain" of case law exists where officers of public corporations have faced personal civil liability for the official acts of their company. I invite you to name one. Just one. Until then, you're blathering in the wind.

Ok, whatever, you win.

 

[Endymio]

Ok, whatever, you win.

Say rather that 'the facts prevailed'. I knew a fact; you accepted a fact: we are at this moment precisely equal. One only truly loses a debate when refusing to accept truths presented.

And to throw a bone to the other side: while it's never before happened, the entire reason Zuckerberg is in court is because one law firm believes this just might be the one case that changes everything. Will it? Unlikely, but we'll see.

 

[ZedRM]

Say rather that 'the facts prevailed'. I knew a fact; you accepted a fact: we are at this moment precisely equal. One only truly loses a debate when refusing to accept truths presented.

And to throw a bone to the other side: while it's never before happened, the entire reason Zuckerberg is in court is because one law firm believes this just might be the one case that changes everything. Will it? Unlikely, but we'll see.

No, I meant what was said. Not willing argue with you.