Mercedes wants EV buyers to get used to paywalled features

nanoguy

Posts: 1,355   +27
Staff member
WTF?! Car companies want to make billions by charging recurring fees for nice-to-have features in their vehicles, some of which are physically present at the time you purchase them. Most consumers aren't biting, but that doesn't mean this trend is going away anytime soon. In the case of Mercedes, it is willing to adjust the pricing in small steps until enough customers fall into the trap to call it a successful strategy.

Last year, BMW added itself to the list of car companies chasing the trend of locking various creature comforts behind a paywall. The company wanted to squeeze more money out of customers in some countries for optional features like heated seats, high beam assist, or a heated steering wheel, so it decided to charge monthly fees for them. Notably, this was just a few short years after a failed attempt to convince BMW fans to pay for using Apple CarPlay.

While manufacturers see this as a great way to improve their bottom line, consumers aren't exactly thrilled about the idea of paying more for features that are already in-place at the time of purchasing their vehicle. Companies like Mercedes have even gone as far as asking for $1,200 annually to unlock the "full performance" of its EQ luxury electric vehicles with what is essentially a software update.

It turns out that Mercedes buyers aren't rushing to pay extra for a small improvement to a car that cost upwards of $100,000. Still, the company isn't giving up and has instead chosen to adjust the pricing structure for the so-called "Acceleration Increase" feature.

For owners of the AWD EQE 350 sedan and its SUV sibling who want more power and speed, pricing now starts at $60 per month for 60 horsepower, or $600 if you pay annually. People who won the pricier AWD EQS 450 car or SUV will have to pay $90 per month or $900 per year to get an additional 80 horsepower. Mercedes is even offering the ability to pay a one-time fee of $1,950 for EQE owners and $2,950 for EQS owners to permanently unlock the feature.

This may sound like madness to many, and a recent survey from AutoPacific confirms that a majority of consumers aren't willing to pay a subscription fee for extras. Last year, a study by Cox Automotive revealed that some people would pay for vehicle performance features if they were reasonably priced ($20 to $25 per month). However, 92 percent of respondents thought features like heated and cooling seats should be included in the car's purchase price.

That said, companies like General Motors, Stellantis, and Ford believe car software and subscription-based features can generate well over $20 billion in annual revenue by 2030. We'll have to wait and see, but one thing's for sure – a growing community of hackers keeps finding ways to circumvent the software locks on some paid features for BMW cars, and it's only a matter of time before they'll be able to do the same for any vehicle with paywalls.

Masthead credit: Aditya Panchal

Permalink to story.

 
Look, people are willing to pay extra to have the features unlocked as it is. Just charge them whatever and let them have it. You want $20/m for *x* feature. Lets say the average life of these cars is 10 years, or 120 months. Just charge the people $2400 to unlock the effing feature! Cars are not Raid: Shadow Legends.

I have no words for this trend, I'm going to go drink my own piss to try to forget about this nonsense.
 
I'm going to wait to see what the EU Regulators will say, but in some ways it may be different. But people want EVs that's software driven so this kind of thing will be the new trend, I guess.
 
Id rather buy Chinese crap for same money than pay monthly for own car...
 
Vote with your wallet.

Not that I’d be buying a luxury car like this anyway, but it’s the same logic buying MS office as a one-time purchase instead of Microsoft 365.

M365 gives you much more and lots of updates, I would compare it better with a leasing where you are always refreshing your care and maintenance is included.

Mercedes and BMW always had this kind of thing for some time or charged tones of money for nonsense or little things. That's why I never bought one.
 
M365 gives you much more and lots of updates, I would compare it better with a leasing where you are always refreshing your care and maintenance is included.

Mercedes and BMW always had this kind of thing for some time or charged tones of money for nonsense or little things. That's why I never bought one.
Good point. At least you can kind of justify the ongoing expense of M365 given the feature updates (though given the choice, I’d still prefer paying for the static feature update as the core functionality is all I really need for my use cases).
 
And watch German car sales drop like a brick by 2030. Any company thinking they can get away with this and that consumers won't move to another manufacturer for a car need to understand how most consumers think. Imagine if Apple charged it's consumers to use the camera app. Madness.
South Korean companies seems to be very popular these days, I can see that trend continuing.
 
Horrible! This is so miserable and greedy that I am speechless! Never buying BMW and Mercedes.
 
Installing your own firmware to take control over physical assets you already own should be 100% legal, in which case this is all moot.
 
They can all kiss my tail .... I buy it I own it and all it's features and if they don't like it, there are still plenty of horses still around ..... LOL
 
I mean why would I buy a luxury car with recurring charges if I have a helo? Doesn't make sense, right?
 
Recurring fees are for services. Like updates, maintenance, cleaning, or maybe fueling/charging. Recurring payments for hardware that is already on the car is utter baloney. Manufacturers can maybe make some stretched arguments for updates, but it is not like a seat heater needs recurring updates.

This is asinine.
 
Ok, so now when you buy a car you only own most of it, not all of it? Even though you are in possession of it physically you can't use it unless you pay a never ending fee? Normally I'm against the government sticking their nose in our business but *THIS* should be made illegal. Car companies should not be able to include physical hardware that you can't use unless you're willing to be fleeced for more money.
 
Vote with your wallet.

Not that I’d be buying a luxury car like this anyway, but it’s the same logic buying MS office as a one-time purchase instead of Microsoft 365. The day I’m forced to move off of a non-subscription version of office/windows is the day I move to a different platform.
That's not the same at all. If you sub to office, you will always have the latest version and be able to use it from any device you can sign into your Microsoft account on. Way better subscription offer than you get with a car.
 
TBH, Mercedes EVs are one of the worst designed EVs in terms of handling, quality, efficiency (purposely excluding EQXX prototype which is pretty much awesome) etc. so them wanting something out of their customers?
Unless they start to make good EVs, their "demands" are irrelevant.
 
TBH, Mercedes EVs are one of the worst designed EVs in terms of handling, quality, efficiency ... so them wanting something out of their customers?
Unless they start to make good EVs, their "demands" are irrelevant.

Even if they had the best EV, due to my principles I wouldn't buy / pay such thing. One of their vehicles, at least in Germany, the EQS buyers can pay a yearly fee for the full 10-degree rear-steering, otherwise, it is limited to 4.5. Which means, the hardware and software capability is there but must be unlocked. If you talk about any very demanding feature which may use cloud (autonomous driving) or that needs extra warranty coverage or service (= more power, more degradation but the company covers it, so the extra payment covers that); in this case from Mercedes... nop. On cases like tesla that you had to pay more to activate heated seats or driving wheel, etc... also nop.

No extra damage covered, no more warranty just more money to unlock...
 
Back