S
ScubaRhys
Well maybe. But are you so sure this is the best pricing model they can come up with?You're only paying for online play... just like all the other consoles....Nintendo HAS learned - apparently YOU haven't...
Well maybe. But are you so sure this is the best pricing model they can come up with?You're only paying for online play... just like all the other consoles....Nintendo HAS learned - apparently YOU haven't...
I'm not.... But I'd bet that Nintendo is... And so is MS and Sony....Well maybe. But are you so sure this is the best pricing model they can come up with?
Why would you expect this? Nintendo has never offered their consoles based on "strength of hardware".... Why would they start now?
"antoher" flop?Perhaps they would do this so they don't have yet another flop on their hands?
I'm sorry buy Playstation conceived of, and continues to dominate with the ultimate console model: Sell console at cost, wait for manufacturing costs to go down so you start profiting off of each console, and then make most of your money from software sales.
Besides the Wii, every Nintendo console has done worse than the previous one. This will likely beat the Wii U, but now it needs to sell more than the 3DS + Wii U (75 million) since it is replacing both. My money is on this thing not breaking 35 million, marking a new low for Nintendo.
"antoher" flop?
Yes, the Wii U was a flop... but the Wii and DS have been quite successful. There's no reason to immediately assume that the Switch will be a flop... certainly not because of a payment model that is no different than its competitors!
Again, the Switch will sink or swim based on the quality of its games - not because of online payments or hardware...
Well... how many consoles do you want in 2 decades?Great.
-1 successful home console in two decades. What an accomplishment.
-The 3DS is "Successful", but it is a far cry from the OG DS' success.
Furthermore I take issue with calling the Wii a wild success. It only seems successful if you ignore how much it set up the Wii U to fail. You can't uncouple them. The Wii alienated third parties, failed to expand its first party studios to compensate for lack of games, and started basically no new major series. In fact it sold less software than the PS3.
P.S. Payment model is the same as its competitors huh? LMAO the free version of PSN (This does exist) offers FAR more content and features than even the paid-for version of Nintendo Online will offer.
Well... how many consoles do you want in 2 decades?
They only released 4... Nintendo 64, Nintendo Gamecube, Wii and WiiU.... 2 were successful, 1 was "meh" and one failed...
The reality of the consoles you just listed: Passable, fail, Ok, HARD fail (Worse than Dreamcast).
That's a downward trend buddy. In fact if you combine portable with those consoles it is STILL a downward trend.
Thus we get to my core argument: Even if the Switch sells 50 million in 5 years, that is less than the Wii U + 3DS. Flop.
Thus Nintendo really needs this thing to sell 100 million to both be a success and make up for their recent catastrophes. No, I don't see a $300 handheld with no software support selling that well; especially not when the market has clearly migrated from PSP's/Gameboys to smartphone gaming. Furthermore I see even graver days ahead with how continually out of touch they are with things regarding first party studios and network infrastructure.
I used to think it wasn't that realistic to think they will just become a third party game studio like Sega, but at this point I wouldn't call that prediction premature..