Amd boys still shocked their favourite performance/watt king is 3 gens behind now
If you can't afford something due to being poor, then just don't buy it and don't insult the company which actually innovates instead of gluing dies together.
Also, stop making benches with 3950x, that cpu is pathetic, slower than 3800x in gaming, often just on par with 3600x due to the glued design and latency penalties and IT IS A MASSIVE BOTTLENECK @1080p and 1440p and depending on a game engine, even in 4K.
You only make those cards look bad.
The conclusion wouldn't change with an Intel CPU though. Steve concludes that the 3090 FE is 10% faster on average compared to an 3080. And TechPowerUp's conclusion to their "MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio Review" is that it is 16% faster than an 3080 on average. But it is also an OC GPU that is 6.6% overclocked out of the box.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-3090-gaming-x-trio/38.html
As TPU stated in their conclusion, the MSI 3090 does have an OC of 6% in combination with raised power limits to increase the GPUs performance.
And if we look at TPU MSI 3090 review's
1080p,1440p and 4k averages, the FPS numbers between Techspot and TPU are almost identical.
1080p Average FPS
TS: 220
TPU: 201
1440p Average FPS
TS: 186
TPU: 179
4k Averager FPS
TS: 120
TPU: 112
TS FPS averages are actually slightly higher, but we do have a few different games being tested between the two. And there could be other differences as well.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-3090-gaming-x-trio/28.html
But the averages are basically the same in this case (though not directly comparable across the board), despite the 3950X being a "massive bottleneck", the average FPS is still very similar. The gaming experience will be largely the same when using the 3950x or an Intel CPU.
And the MSI OC 3090 FE is also only 16% faster on average at TPUs MSI 3090 review, even with an 5ghz 9900k Intel CPU paired with 4000mhz RAM. And if we add an extra 6% to TS own 10% gains to make it 16% gain on average, it will not change the result in any notable way at all. Yes, it would be little bit faster, but not anywhere near enough to change Steve's conclusion or the recommendation. An extra 6% added to these numbers would not change the recommendation.
So it doesn't matter if you own an Intel or AMD CPU, the 3090 FE is just poor value in comparison to the 3080 for the average gamer. At least the MSI 3090 OC has a better cooler and is 6% overclocked out of the box, but it is also $100 more expensive vs the 3090 FE, so I still don't think it is a good buy coming in at $1500 for the MSI 3090.
And considering the 3090 has 20% more shaders vs the 3080, and that even with an MSI 3090 OC at TPU when paired with an 5ghz 9900k and 4000mhz RAM, it still only gave 16% extra performance over their 3080. So it is still poor value at such a price. The conclusion would be the same. It is still too expensive for too little added performance. Most gamers would do well to stick with the much better value 3080 (or even the upcoming 3070).