Overwatch 2 coming to Steam on August 10, more Blizzard games to follow

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,376   +43
Staff
What just happened? Blizzard Entertainment has historically been one of the few major PC game developers successful enough to survive without releasing its titles on Valve's dominant Steam storefront. Seeing Overwatch 2 receive a Steam page feels like the end of an era, but Blizzard says it won't leave Battle.net any time soon.

Overwatch 2 recently received a Steam page with a release date set for August 10. Blizzard also confirmed that more of its titles will come to Valve's ubiquitous game client without further specification.

To be clear, this isn't a migration. Blizzard stressed that nothing is happening to Battle.net, the service that has been the backend for the company's online titles for over two decades. Playing Overwatch 2 through Steam will still require a Battle.net account, which will enable cross-platform play, but won't need to run on Blizzard's launcher.

Although Blizzard didn't say which additional games it would release on Steam, it recognized user demand for "a selection" of its titles on the service, suggesting it doesn't plan to re-introduce its entire back catalog. The most likely candidates are recent releases like Diablo IV, Diablo Immortal, and Diablo II Resurrected. Evergreen successes like World of Warcraft, Hearthstone, and StarCraft Remastered could also theoretically appear.

Some could see the announcement as an attempt to help Overwatch 2 recover from its recent struggles. In May, fans were disappointed to learn Blizzard had scrapped most of the game's planned co-op content. This week, Activision's latest earnings report revealed that Overwatch 2 engagement has declined significantly. Furthermore, recent Blizzard layoffs have brought the future of the professional Overwatch League into question.

The company's changing policy follows Activision's decision to return the latest Call of Duty games to the Steam platform. Activision started releasing PC versions of new entries exclusively on Battle.net but recently uncovered documents reveal that the venture failed to increase user engagement, prompting the reversal.

Another curious factor in the decision to bring Blizzard games to Steam is that it comes just as Microsoft prepares to acquire Activision Blizzard for $69 billion. Since the deal's announcement, users have speculated on the possibility of seeing Blizzard titles on Steam, the Microsoft Store, and Game Pass, where Microsoft releases all its PC games.

The situation resembles when Microsoft bought Bethesda, which operated a separate game client while simultaneously releasing titles on Steam. Eventually, Bethesda discontinued its storefront to focus on Steam and Microsoft's platforms. However, Battle.net is far less likely to disappear in the short term, as it hosts some of the most popular PC games and a community that predates Steam.

Overwatch 2's August 10 launch on Steam coincides with the release of its Invasion expansion, which will introduce a new playable character, game mode, progression system, and co-op missions.

Permalink to story.

 
One wonders if I will be able to move my existing licenses over to Steam? I'm happy to do that if it eliminates yet another game launcher. I have no issue with Battle.Net but if I can launch from my Steam library, it will make things a little easier and I won't have to have Battle.Net sitting in the background.
 
I use to play Overwatch and haven't even tried Overwatch 2. I don't care for their free-to-play model and the fact that they killed off the original Overwatch. So I moved on to other games. I never cared about Overwatch league. I don't know anyone who did. I know some people streamed it in the background and ignored it so they could get free in-game items. Poor advertisers were paying and these guys weren't even watching. But some of the guys from my old Overwatch team quit because Blizzard was getting too political or woke as they call it. Seems like in the new social media era, every business thinks they should get political, but I think in most cases it is not smart business to alienate a percentage of your customers. There are a few exceptions, but Blizzard is not one of them. Putting it on Steam isn't going to get me and my friends start playing this game, but maybe it will for other people.
 
One wonders if I will be able to move my existing licenses over to Steam? I'm happy to do that if it eliminates yet another game launcher. I have no issue with Battle.Net but if I can launch from my Steam library, it will make things a little easier and I won't have to have Battle.Net sitting in the background.
You will need Battle.net account regardless. So it will be just another secondary launcher, like EA, Ubisoft and everyone else.
 
You will need Battle.net account regardless. So it will be just another secondary launcher, like EA, Ubisoft and everyone else.

Yep. That's how it works.

I don't even remember what game(s) I have purchased through Steam years back that are actually Ubisoft games, but whenever I launched the game I was still required to have an account through Ubisoft that linked my game on Steam to my Ubisoft account because my game key needed to be verified and linked to my Ubisoft account that is activated through Steam. I thought purchasing it on Steam would mean it just uses Steam to run, but it still required having Ubisoft's Uplay installed.

After that I learned to purchase games by Ubisoft through their digital platform because it caused less issues when launching a game. For a while Uplay had issues when trying to launch and run a game you started through Steam. Less hoops to jump through means less issues, at least that's what I took from it.
 
Back