Pixel phones from Project Fi are showing up blacklisted (Updated)

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,181   +1,427
Staff member

Update #3: So far, Kyle has chased and pestered support personnel from Google to T-Mobile to Swappa trying to determine what to do about his disabled Pixel XL. After jumping on the Pixel Community forums and starting a thread about the issue, he received a response from a Project Fi Community Manager. Not only did she outwardly acknowledge that the problem is occurring for multiple users, but she also assured him that they would fix the issue.

Hi everyone,

Thank you for sharing this with us on the Forum. Our team is aware, and we are working to restore access to impacted devices.

Thank you,

Alena

Project Fi Community Manager

This news could be good for anyone affected by the Pixel blacklisting debacle. However, Kyle warns everyone to take the promises with a healthy grain of salt.

"It is good to know that Project Fi is aware of this, but every communication I have had with Google about this started with 'we will get this fixed,'" Kyle wrote. "So I am not putting much faith in this statement."

Update #2: According to Kyle at HardOCP, Google has flipped on its story again. After assuring him that his phone must have been reported lost or stolen and that Google had nothing to do with it, Kyle reached out to the party who sold him the phone.

The seller claims that Project Fi contacted him and said that "these phones have not been reported stolen (a third 180 degree turn on that stance), and it does in fact ('fact' is used loosely here) seem to be an issue with Pixel phones originally purchased from Project Fi."

Despite Google's shifty excuses, it seems there will be a happy ending to the ordeal. The problem apparently stemmed from the Project Fi's system not separating the phones from their prior Project Fi accounts. The seller tells HardOCP that they should be able to resolve the situation to get his phone working again.

A little exposure on the problem seemed to help after all. Score one for the press.

Update #1: Google contacted Kyle again admitting that the phone was, in fact, blacklisted, but that they did not have anything to do with it.

"The seller whom you purchased it from, might have gotten a device from someone else who stole/lost it earlier, hence the original owner of the device reported it lost/stolen and the law enforcement might have blocked it after the original owner contacted them. [sic] Google doesn't blacklist the devices, we ask the customers to contact law enforcement or carrier to block the devices from usage when customers contact us when they have lost the device or gotten stolen. [sic] This is not an issue from our end."

However, Google's explanation still does not clarify why Swappa has received a "great number" of blacklisting complaints regarding Pixel devices. Something has to be causing a surge in Pixel phones being lost or stolen in the last two days.

Last November, DansDeals reported that hundreds of accounts had been suspended by Google after it had discovered many Pixel phone owners had resold their phones to circumvent a U.S. sales tax loophole for profit.

According to the report, a number of Pixel phones were purchased from Google’s Project Fi, a mobile carrier that uses multiple networks for broader signal coverage. The phones were shipped to a reseller in New Hampshire, which does not have a sales tax. The profit from the untaxed phones was then split with the customers.

Under Google Store's terms of service policy, commercial resell of Google devices is prohibited.

"You may only purchase Devices for your personal use. You may not commercially resell any Device, but you may give the Device as a gift."

In response, Google shuttered all accounts involved in the scheme. Hundreds of users began complaining about not being able to access their email, photos, the app store, or anything else “linked to the [offending] online identity.”

Today there has been at least one report and possibly more that particular Pixel phones are becoming blacklisted. Blacklisting occurs when a phone’s IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) number is reported as stolen or lost. It essentially prevents the phone from being used except for 911 emergency calls.

Kyle from HardOCP reported that this has happened to his Pixel XL. He said the blocking came out of nowhere with no warning. He contacted his carrier T-Mobile, but they informed him that there is nothing that they can do to reverse the blacklisting.

Kyle had purchased the phone online through Swappa, which acts as a broker for buyers and sellers of used phones. Speaking with Swappa support, he discovered that he was not the only one experiencing the problem.

“Sorry to hear of the complaints. We have seen a great number of Pixel devices becoming blacklisted the past two days. We are still trying to figure out why this has happened to so many devices. We are working to find out the cause of this widespread issue.”

Swappa suggested that he contact Google to see if they could get to the bottom of the problem. Google initially claimed that they were thoroughly aware of what was going on and that his phone was not actually blacklisted; that he was receiving a spam message. However, Kyle checked his IMEI, and the number was definitely coming back blacklisted.

After confronting Google with his IMEI check, Google support finally told him, “The phone had not been reported stolen, but had been sold through the ‘Project Fi Team.’”

Could this have been connected to the actions taken back in November?

The support specialist informed him that she would be escalating the issue to Project Fi and that he would be hearing from them in about 24 hours. When asked for a support ticket, the representative would not provide him with one, only indicating he would receive one via email.

Kyle is still waiting to hear from the Project Fi team. If you have had a similar experience or have more information regarding the whole Pixel/Project Fi situation, please share with us in the comments.

Permalink to story.

 
Oh, so its FINE when Google dodges taxes by moving its operations to Ireland or wherever but if a reseller tries to take advantage of different tax laws, THAT'S bad.

What Google does is legal. Breaching terms of use is technically grounds for a civil suit. That is a distinct difference. The laws would be changed to prevent 'loopholes' if Congress actually wanted to stop them, but remember mostly digital companies can relocate pretty easily and take all the jobs with them.

I don't think what Google did is right, but they should have the right to do exactly what they did.
 
It's unfortunate that should someone take this to Court, they will find out quickly that the Judge cares nothing about justice, what they totally care about is the Law. We have no Justice system, we have a Legal system and there is a big difference between the two.
 
Why not just go after the sellers and not the buyers. They can take the list from their shipment records together with the IMEI. There is no way 2nd hand buyers will know if the phone is tied to this project-fi.
 
Does this suck? Yes. Is this Google's fault? No. When you buy things through resellers, the original company owes you nothing, as you are not their customer. When you buy from other sources, you are willing taking a risk. It's just like investing. You put your money into something. If that something goes south, you have no one to blame but yourself.

I hate to sound mean or cynical, but we're all adults here, so I ain't sugar coating, lol. This is why I NEVER buy electronics second-hand. At least not from non-reputable stores. But from random people on the internet? No. Becuase THIS is the risk that YOU as the buyer take. You are now out $600 and a phone, with nobody to blame but yourself.

BUT!!! Google could have potentially handled this better. My question is, are they able to use the IMEI to find any contact information on the phone (such as the account registered to the phone)? If so, contact the owner of the phone and let them know of the situation, and that they have a limited amount of time to get a new phone before the phone will become blacklisted and inoperable. Or, if possible, create a message that can be sent to the phones through a systemwide message.

If they could have done one of these two things, then although they wouldn't be required to do so, it would have been great PR for them to have done so. If they are unable to do these things, then oh well. Not their problem that you purchased a phone from someone who purchased it from the company and then violated the policy that came with purchasing the phone from them.
 
Mine (bought on CL) blacklisted day before yesterday after 5 months of usage. I fail to understand howz it's stolen or lost when we r calling Google n telling them here is the phone. Rep told me I know u have the physical device but in system it's stolen so technically it's stolen.... It's like in system ur dead now u can't prove it you are alive... Sometimes I feel these companies r willingly part of these scams.
 
Oh, so its FINE when Google dodges taxes by moving its operations to Ireland or wherever but if a reseller tries to take advantage of different tax laws, THAT'S bad.

What Google does is legal. Breaching terms of use is technically grounds for a civil suit. That is a distinct difference. The laws would be changed to prevent 'loopholes' if Congress actually wanted to stop them, but remember mostly digital companies can relocate pretty easily and take all the jobs with them.

I don't think what Google did is right, but they should have the right to do exactly what they did.

That doesn't make it any less hypocritical. Every big company is "legally" exploiting every loophole known to man to save a buck or two. Or a billion. Yes, this was in direct contradiction to their ToS, but it shouldn't be the end users taking the rap for this.

You wanna do this right, you track down the sellers and settle things with them.
 
Oh, so its FINE when Google dodges taxes by moving its operations to Ireland or wherever but if a reseller tries to take advantage of different tax laws, THAT'S bad.

Its a strategy, but it isn't illegal. Several big name companies do this. If you had a big company, you would too.
 
Mine (bought on CL) blacklisted day before yesterday after 5 months of usage. I fail to understand howz it's stolen or lost when we r calling Google n telling them here is the phone. Rep told me I know u have the physical device but in system it's stolen so technically it's stolen.... It's like in system ur dead now u can't prove it you are alive... Sometimes I feel these companies r willingly part of these scams.

Be patient, ask to speak to somebody else (most of the first reps you talk to are going to be *****s) and make sure you explain that this is becoming an issue and that you are well aware that several users are experiencing the same issue.
 
This happened to me yesterday. I spent hours talking to various tech support representatives from T-MOBILE, Verizon and Google. Google said nothing about the issue with Project Fi phones. I am livid right now.
 
While I feel bad for the end user, this is a good move.

How so? It doesn't punish the person who committed the crime. It just screws over someone three or four people down the line. And, if they were like me, can actually cause harm.

I was out and running errands when my phone stopped working. Fortunately, I live in the city where public transportation and wifi connections are abundant. If I lived out in the sticks and my phone was my main form of communication, that could be very bad.
 
2 of my 3 Pixel phones showed up blacklisted 2 days ago.
I made a reddit post yesterday of my issue. I though it was part of an insurance fraud scam.

https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixe..._my_3_google_pixel_phones_blacklisted_on_the/

I had originally though our phones were from Verizon not Google Fi. We were happy Pixel customers that are now considering purchasing different phones because Google can report as stolen whenever they feel a Google Fi device was not transferred to a new owner per their TOS. How can any user purchasing a pre-owned or "new" Google Pixel be sure that it isn't a Google Fi device and won't be blacklisted in the future?
 
Had the same issue happen to me.. but im actually a seller... the buyer contacted me the other day.. 3 months after I sold the phone to him... I though he was trying to scam me.. after checking it was blacklisted.. I contacted project fi and they escalated the issue... so the people that are thinking this is only happening to sellers either not paying the phone off or running some type of scam I can assure you it is happening in legit cases also... I paid off the phone before I sold it...
 
Mine (bought on CL) blacklisted day before yesterday after 5 months of usage. I fail to understand howz it's stolen or lost when we r calling Google n telling them here is the phone. Rep told me I know u have the physical device but in system it's stolen so technically it's stolen.... It's like in system ur dead now u can't prove it you are alive... Sometimes I feel these companies r willingly part of these scams.
If the person who sold it to you stole the phone from someone else, then the phone IS stolen even though it wasn't stolen from you. The problem is that we have a seller below who says he bought the phone from Google and then resold it and now it is marked as stolen. Class-action suite is your only recourse at this stage.
 
How so? It doesn't punish the person who committed the crime. It just screws over someone three or four people down the line. And, if they were like me, can actually cause harm.

I was out and running errands when my phone stopped working. Fortunately, I live in the city where public transportation and wifi connections are abundant. If I lived out in the sticks and my phone was my main form of communication, that could be very bad.
Not googles fault. The onus is on you to bring punishment to your scammer through either refunds, criminal charges or social embarrassment. Who ever sold you the phone, it's their issue, not googles. I wish it would work your way, I could get someone to steal a car, sell it to me, then when the original owner who had it stolen wants it back, I can say "not my problem". (not an equal analogy, but hope you see what I mean).
 
Not googles fault. The onus is on you to bring punishment to your scammer through either refunds, criminal charges or social embarrassment. Who ever sold you the phone, it's their issue, not googles. I wish it would work your way, I could get someone to steal a car, sell it to me, then when the original owner who had it stolen wants it back, I can say "not my problem". (not an equal analogy, but hope you see what I mean).
There is a seller in this thread who says he bought it directly from Google, paid it off and then resold it and the new owner has his found blacklisted. If no previous legal owned reported it stolen, then who did. I am more partial to believe datkidpatrick than Google. Either this is a hack into the system that records phones as stolen or Google has done this to the phones that were resold intentionally.
 
There is a seller in this thread who says he bought it directly from Google, paid it off and then resold it and the new owner has his found blacklisted. If no previous legal owned reported it stolen, then who did. I am more partial to believe datkidpatrick than Google. Either this is a hack into the system that records phones as stolen or Google has done this to the phones that were resold intentionally.
It says quite clearly you can't buy and then sell without paying the sales tax. This isn't on googles end, it's on the govermenets end. Works this way with many items that are Tax-exempt for certian people. Conditions are if you buy, it is for your own use. Example: Tax-free cigarettes, purple gas, etc etc.... buying it has a set of conditions that you are agreeing to. If you do not agree with these conditions, then you should not buy it. If someone has mislead you to buy something they did not have the right to sell, that is an issue between the buyer and the seller, not the buyer and the company that made it. Now if the buyer contacts google and pays what would be the original government sales tax, then I am sure it would be reinstated/unblacklisted.
 
It says quite clearly you can't buy and then sell without paying the sales tax. This isn't on googles end, it's on the govermenets end. Works this way with many items that are Tax-exempt for certian people. Conditions are if you buy, it is for your own use. Example: Tax-free cigarettes, purple gas, etc etc.... buying it has a set of conditions that you are agreeing to. If you do not agree with these conditions, then you should not buy it. If someone has mislead you to buy something they did not have the right to sell, that is an issue between the buyer and the seller, not the buyer and the company that made it. Now if the buyer contacts google and pays what would be the original government sales tax, then I am sure it would be reinstated/unblacklisted.
So much wrong with this. First, Google claims the phones were reported as stolen. This is often not the case. Further, why would they pay Google the tax on a resale? They would pay tax to the U.S. government through their taxes like any other small business. To be clear, I don't own a Pixel, I just don't like to see Google lying when this practice of blacklisting resold phones made the news.
 
Had the same issue happen to me.. but im actually a seller... the buyer contacted me the other day.. 3 months after I sold the phone to him... I though he was trying to scam me.. after checking it was blacklisted.. I contacted project fi and they escalated the issue... so the people that are thinking this is only happening to sellers either not paying the phone off or running some type of scam I can assure you it is happening in legit cases also... I paid off the phone before I sold it...
Did you pay tax on the phone purchase?
 
Same thing happen to me sold 128gb to a guy on swappa about 4 months ago turn out to be blacklisted
Call Google they say they don't see anything on their end , thats horrible
 
So much wrong with this. First, Google claims the phones were reported as stolen. This is often not the case. Further, why would they pay Google the tax on a resale? They would pay tax to the U.S. government through their taxes like any other small business. To be clear, I don't own a Pixel, I just don't like to see Google lying when this practice of blacklisting resold phones made the news.
They are not stolen, but can not be resold hence breaking the contract and voiding the sale - resulting in a stolen (or unpaid) classification for legal purposes. This is the terms of the contract based on the no tax. If they allowed it and NOT blacklisted the phones, they would be sued buy the IRS for tax evasion. Google is not required to pay tax on the resale, but MUST on the original sale which was exempt for the trail if the phones are to be resold from a reseller trying to dodge the tax. They are not lying, it just is confusing on the surface to a lot of people not in the business.
 
Back