You got my meaning alright. I was just making a point in discussion about news "in general". Whether somebody is biased or not, left or right, religious, young or old, race or nationality, whatever. If their "news" is "fact", then is it any less worthy to hear? After all a fact is a fact. So I guess my point is that presentation and omission of other facts, is what defines ones bias as far as news goes. Because if the news is blatantly reporting falsehoods, can't somebody sue? I think it would be an interresting study to hear the report of the SAME bit of news by a handful of clearly different thinking people! Come to think of it, maybe I don't have a point. Just trying to spark a different thought process is all.