Rival chipmakers Intel and AMD to collaborate on mobile CPU with integrated graphics

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,306   +193
Staff member

Rival competitors in the technology sector rarely collaborate. Companies traditionally focus on their own products and services in hopes of gaining so much market share that the other becomes irrelevant or ripe for acquisition.

That’s not always the case, however, as titans like Apple and Samsung have demonstrated. Expensive legal battles aside, the former for years has relied on the latter as a component supplier for its mobile devices.

Now, we can add two more fierce competitors to the list of unlikely business partners.

On Monday, it was revealed that AMD and Intel will converge for the first time in a bid to reduce the thickness of mobile platforms.

Despite considerable advancements, most enthusiast-grade laptops feature a significant footprint that’s necessitated by discrete graphics. Intel’s new product will slim the usual silicon footprint down to less than half that of standard discrete components on a motherboard.

The move, according to Intel’s Christopher Walker, will allow OEMs to be more creative and deliver innovative thin and light designs with improved thermal dissipation. Furthermore, it frees up valuable real estate that can be used to improve battery life, create new motherboard layouts, experiment with new cooling solutions and more.

The unnamed product will be based on Intel’s 8th generation Core family. It’ll feature second generation High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2) and an Intel-exclusive, semi-custom discrete graphics chip from AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, all of which will be rolled into a single processor package.

Key to the new design is the use of Intel’s Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB). This technology is described as a bridge that allows heterogeneous silicon to quickly pass information in extremely close proximity. According to Walker, EMIB eliminates height impact as well as manufacturing and design complexities, thus enabling faster, more powerful and more efficient products in smaller sizes.

The new chip will be the first consumer product to use EMIB and the first mobile PC to utilize HBM2.

The silicon will additionally feature a power sharing framework that is tailor-made to connect the processor, discrete graphics chip and dedicated graphics memory. In addition to helping manage temperature, power delivery and performance states in real time, it also enables system designers to adjust the ratio of power sharing between the processor and graphics based on workloads and usages.

Word of a potential partnership between the rival chipmakers first surfaced nearly a year ago but was dismissed by many as being a bit too far-fetched for reality.

Intel in recent years has held the CPU performance crown but its integrated graphics solutions were never quite on the same level as AMD’s. The landscape has changed quite a bit as of late but as last year’s rumor indicates, this deal was likely in the works long before Ryzen’s launch.

Scott Herkelman, vice president and general manager of AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, said the collaboration with Intel expands the installed base for AMD Radeon GPUs and brings to market a differentiated solution for high-performance graphics. The executive added that together, they are offering gamers and content creators the opportunity to have a thinner and lighter PC that is capable of delivering discrete performance-tier graphics experiences in AAA games and content creation applications.

If successful, the partnership certainly puts Nvidia in a precarious spot.

More information, including systems from major OEMs based on the technology, is expected in the first quarter of 2018. With CES just around the corner, Las Vegas could be a likely launching point.

Permalink to story.

 
It looks like Nvidia stepped on Intel's toes a bit too much. I guess the plan is to now cut Nvidia completely out of the mobile market (except for ultra high end). Intel is going to be offering it's Intel CPU / AMD GPU chips in a form factor much smaller then if they had to add discrete Nvidia graphics. In addition, Vega in general operates very power efficiently at lower frequencies. If you follow the Vega undervolt scene, you can cut power consumption of the GPU in half by simply undervolting and lowering the clock by 100 MHz, which will see around a 9% reduction in performance for a 140w power savings.
 
This is amusing considering AMD have their first truly competitive CPUs out in years.
true........but the 6 core coffee lake cpus just killed amds 8 core cpus pretty much lol. threadripper is still a beast though and amd is supposedly releasing refreshes next year
 
I think this relates to the form factor of what they are trying to deliver and the reason AMD won the Apple contract was nothing to do with performance but how thin they could manufacture iGPU etc.

Either way good news I think for everyone.... well except maybe NVidia but they more than likely they don't care as they are after the machine learning market atm.
 
I’d be looking forward to this in Apple’s Mac mini refresh. My mid-2010 Mac mini Plex Media Server needs replacing and one with this processor would be a great replacement.
 
I hope the next news will not be about NVidia pairing with revived Cyrix to create a new cpu,
 
AMD needs to get help and funds of whatever it comes. They had a huge win with Ryzen, but a big loss with Vega. Considering AMD is in debt and that consoles can't save AMD this could help them to keep afloat.
 
We could call it the Anti-Snapdragon too... only way Intel can have enough gpu power on high scalable platform from smart things to computers is getting a hand from AMD Radeon gpus.
 
Two quick note:
1) this isn’t the first time they worked together, just the first in a very long time.

2) noting on performance benchmarks. When you step away from games; AMD has long been champion of raw math. H265 encoding, mining, mathematics, science. AMD has long been on top. For some reason many tech reviews appear to have lost sight of reality and simply post how high a synthetic score is on this/that benchmark program. Or how many frames per second you get on call of duty #70.

Back in the real world we want to know how many seconds does it take to load word? How fast does a pc cold boot. How fast does chrome or Firefox restart and restore a session with 50 open tabs.

The few places you can find such important information always put AMD’s flagships over intel at a fraction of the price.

Final thought: since there’s no benefit to AMD working with intel one has to wonder what AMD is getting out of this. Intel needs AMD, not the other way around.
 
Back