Well as long as you
guessing based on an assumption that all international law is the same...
Is there any valid reason for this post? I pretty much stated I was guessing against US law practice.. So, was this just an excuse to put up an emoji, since we're not covering any new ground?
These is such a thing as an, "instant offense". In which case a time variable could be placed on when the next time the same "instant offense", could be charged..
For example, you get a parking ticket at 6969 wayward lane. It doesn't last you for the rest of your life. So, you can't carry the ticket around in your glove box, and think it excuses you for the next time you illegally park there.. And, if you double park in front of the Kremlin, I'm pretty sure they'll either tow your car away, or run over it with a tank. (But here again, this is speculation, so you won't feel the need to comment).
So, if we're treating these broadcasts as "instant offenses", more than likely, they they'll fine you again if you broadcast it again tomorrow. ("Broadcast", is the quaint way we boomers refer to "streaming").
So, what do you think the Russians will do, take the 13 grand and look the other way, fine Netflix again for subsequent offenses, and/or force more rigid controls on Netflix?
Here's a synopsis of Russian criminal law:
https://www.imolin.org/doc/amlid/Russian_Federation_Criminal_Code.pdf Dig in.
One thing I found very interesting is a mother can kill a newborn, and only pull a nickel. (Unless of course they tack on "enemy of the state" for kicks).