1080p remains a very popular resolution for budget monitor buyers, and at the higher end, 1080p also offers a great experience for competitive gamers thanks to super high refresh rates.
1080p remains a very popular resolution for budget monitor buyers, and at the higher end, 1080p also offers a great experience for competitive gamers thanks to super high refresh rates.
Given how expensive video cards are right now, 1080p is great for gaming.Maybe re-title this article "The Best of the Worst Monitors of 2021".... Now, 1080p is perfectly fine for office usage, but the accent on frame rates led me to believe that this article was about 'gaming'. And 1080p and gaming in the same sentence.... Oxymoronic.
Maybe re-title this article "The Best of the Worst Monitors of 2021".... Now, 1080p is perfectly fine for office usage, but the accent on frame rates led me to believe that this article was about 'gaming'. And 1080p and gaming in the same sentence.... Oxymoronic.
...Continues to form 67% of the market, with only 8% on 1440p, 2.4% on 2160p, 2.6% on Ultrawide and the rest using *less* than 1080p?... (link)And 1080p and gaming in the same sentence...
Well if "4k" is measured by counting horizontal pixels and is still "4k" despite 3840 falling short of 4000 pixels by 4%, then 1920 width (1080p) literally is 2k to the exact same 4% short of 2000 ratio (and 1440p is 2.6k, with "1k" being more like 1024x768). The "2k monitor" marketing is completely nonsensical enough (even before Ultrawides made it even less relevant) that it's actually easier, more accurate and less confusing just to quote the full resolution instead of the "shorthand".I even left 2K behind a few years ago. So, imagine 1K!
Nope, 1920x1080 is 1 quarter of 3840x2160. So, it is 1K (using round numbers) and not 2K. There is an error in your reasoning. I used 4K, 2K, 1K because, though not exactly so, it is more simple to describe than UHD, QXGA, QHD, WQXGA, etc. (what a mess!)...Continues to form 67% of the market, with only 8% on 1440p, 2.4% on 2160p, 2.6% on Ultrawide and the rest using *less* than 1080p?... (link)
Well if "4k" is measured by counting horizontal pixels and is still "4k" despite 3840 falling short of 4000 pixels by 4%, then 1920 width (1080p) literally is 2k to the exact same 4% short of 2000 ratio (and 1440p is 2.6k, with "1k" being more like 1024x768). The "2k monitor" marketing is completely nonsensical enough (even before Ultrawides made it even less relevant) that it's actually easier, more accurate and less confusing just to quote the full resolution instead of the "shorthand".
No what you're doing there is the resolution equivalent of saying a 32" monitor is 4x bigger than a 28.4" monitor because you took the former's screen width (27.8") then "compared" it to the latter's height (13.9") and falsely cross-compared two different things by measuring them differently for absolutely no logical reason whatsoever. Your "quadrupling" maths only work when you're actually comparing pixel count vs pixel count, eg, 8 Megapixel (2160p) vs 2 Megapixel (1080p) is correct. "If 3840 is 4k then 1920 is 1k" is not accurate at all as the "4k" label is based specifically on pixel width (3840) not pixel count and you do actually have to compare like for like for any label to have any meaning (imagine the huge mess going shopping for a printer where A3 sized printers were measured across the paper diagonal but A4 printers were missold as A5 by measuring across the paper width so that those with A3 or larger printers could feel more special about the label or something ...)Nope, 1920x1080 is 1 quarter of 3840x2160. So, it is 1K (using round numbers) and not 2K. There is an error in your reasoning. I used 4K, 2K, 1K because, though not exactly so, it is more simple to describe than UHD, QXGA, QHD, WQXGA, etc. (what a mess!)
Once you play in 4K you cannot return to any lower resolution. I have experienced this directly.To be honest, I enjoy being "left behind" playing at 1080p. I even bought that AoC last summer because of the ergonomics and because I needed to reclaim some space in my desk.
In fact I expect to be playing at 1080p until any other resolution takes its spot as the entry level resolution. I don't need more pixels and it lets me cheap out in graphic horsepower.
I play rts, 60 fps Va monitor is fair enough. I play genshin impact, 60 fps is fair enough. I play lot of others games... I play League of legends... and while I have to admit with a 120hz group fighting is cleaner, I can go platinum with 60hz va monitor aswell.Given that 240hz plus is an absolute requirement for millions of gamers statements like this one are beyond absurd. I have a 1440p 120hz and while it's nice, it's input lag and response time are dogs hit compared to my 280hz 1080p Asus TUF. If all you play is Battleroyale then 240hz is a key advantage. We don't spend 20 hours per week aim training in Kovaaks to run sub 100fps games. We don't use vsync, gsync, adaptive sync or any other nonsense because you don't need it at 200+ FPS.
yep im staying with 1080p too. I have tried 2k, and my bro is using a 4k 60hz so I know them. Honestly I won't mind about the ergonomics, we can always buy an arm to position our monitor as we wish... what it is matter is the monitor itself.To be honest, I enjoy being "left behind" playing at 1080p. I even bought that AoC last summer because of the ergonomics and because I needed to reclaim some space in my desk.
In fact I expect to be playing at 1080p until any other resolution takes its spot as the entry level resolution. I don't need more pixels and it lets me cheap out in graphic horsepower.
1080P is the most widely used resolution in regards to gaming. Cost and FPS mean something when on a budget yet wanting to play FPS games .. and if you aren't playing FPS games then you aren't really a gamer are you ... you're just a pretender.Maybe re-title this article "The Best of the Worst Monitors of 2021".... Now, 1080p is perfectly fine for office usage, but the accent on frame rates led me to believe that this article was about 'gaming'. And 1080p and gaming in the same sentence.... Oxymoronic.
1080P is the most widely used resolution in regards to gaming. Cost and FPS mean something when on a budget yet wanting to play FPS games .. and if you aren't playing FPS games then you aren't really a gamer are you ... you're just a pretender.
1080P = cheaper psu, graphics card and gaming monitor while managing to achieve a high FPS average for a more fluid gaming experience.
Nah, 1440p is the new 1080p, time to put that crap resolution to pasture. 1440p screens are plenty cheap enough now and even a 1070 can handle most games at 1440p.
https://www.amazon.com/Pixio-Radeon-FreeSync-Esports-Monitor/dp/B08TYX8HN6/
Pixio PX248 Prime S 24 inch 165Hz IPS 1ms FHD 1080p AMD Radeon FreeSync Esports IPS Gaming Monitor $179.99