The European Union calls for robot rights but still wants a kill switch

midian182

Posts: 9,760   +121
Staff member

We may be many years away from robots that have personalities indistinguishable from humans, but the European Parliament (EP) is already preparing for such a future, calling for advanced artificial intelligences to be granted “electronic personhood” to ensure their rights.

Yesterday, members of the EP voted 17 to 2 in favor of a report written by Luxembourg politician Mady Delvaux that suggests a regulatory framework with regards to robotics and the law. It claims that AI is "poised to unleash a new industrial revolution, which is likely to leave no stratum of society untouched."

"A growing number of areas of our daily lives are increasingly affected by robotics," said Delvaux. "To ensure that robots are and will remain in the service of humans, we urgently need to create a robust European legal framework." 

The report calls for Isaac Asimov's three laws of robotics to be implemented in AI design: robots must never allow humans to come to harm, they must obey all orders from humans, and must protect their own existence unless that means disobeying the first two rules.

It also suggests there should be a way to identify that a robot is a machine and not a human, so no Westworld/Blade Runner-style androids. In addition to giving them “specific legal status,” robot insurance should also be mandatory, as should a system for registering and tracking the machines.

For those concerned about a Skynet-inspired robot takeover, Delvaux believes all advanced AIs should come with a kill switch that can remotely deactivate them, should they start thinking about overthrowing humans.

The report also covers other areas of robotics, such as self-driving cars and the threat of large-scale unemployment as automation eliminates more jobs.

The full house of the European Parliament will vote on the draft proposals in February, which will need to be approved by absolute majority.    

Permalink to story.

 
So they want to give robots rights, so long as they can keep the right to shut them off at any time.

I suppose this means they're done fixing all the real problems in the world that now they can work on imaginary ones?

They should also make it illegal for unicorns to poop on the sidewalk.
 
Doesn't the EU have a few more, just slightly more pressing matters to worry about right now? One would correctly assume so.
 
Doesn't the EU have a few more, just slightly more pressing matters to worry about right now? One would correctly assume so.

People are jumping ship on the EU. Their only salvation will be an army of sentient robots, right up until President Trump IX in the year 2102 informs the EU mecha army their leaders put control switches in all of them, just like what happed to the Cylons.
 
Robots are property.

True Artificial Intelligence (which doesn't exist yet) deserves rights.

It's the difference between "Johnny 5" and SAINT 1, 2, 3, 4,6, etc
 
How out of touch with the world and the current state of technology can you possibly be?

I wonder if they think siri/alexa has feelings or interests...
 
This is a case of them wanting to be ready. Robotics is expected to make a huge impact over the next 5-10 years. This TS article is sensationalizing a few of the minor points. This call was for a legal framework defining where a robot can and cannot be used, how and how not it can be used, and what mechanisms there are to enforce this. It is about protecting workers and populations from being displaced from their jobs, or using robots to 'legally' commit crimes. This entail killswitches that can be activated even if robotics advances to a point where instructing them is not unlike a manager issuing an instruction to an employee, or if there is no physical offswitch to throw (because it is a distributed AI). This was written as a way to bake in some foresight into the law from the start, rather than having to re-legislate along the way.

Techspot, and other tech news sites, latched onto this last bit, and went "OMG, Bill of Rights for Roombas. LOL"
 
Robots don't need rights until they are "self concious" or something along the lines of Westworld. That might take another 100 years if not probably more. At that point they are more of a programmable clone than anything.
 
Robots don't need rights until they are "self concious" or something along the lines of Westworld. That might take another 100 years if not probably more. At that point they are more of a programmable clone than anything.

Robots/androids/cyborgs will never, EVER be conscious like a human being can be, not in 100 years, not in 100 million years.
 
Drones are robots. If a drone harms me by violating my privacy or creating noise in my home, I blow it to smithereens. Asimov's first law is upheld.
 
Back