Which CPU to buy for Crysis 3, AC3 etc.?

Hi guys,I will be playing games such as crysis 3,AC 3 etc,please help me choose my CPU.
Which will the best considering the performance -price ratio??
1. amd fx 6100- 146 $
2. amd fx 8120- 177 $
3. core i5 2320- 204 $
4. core i5 3450- 214 $
Thanks in advance

1. amd fx 6100- 146 $ - PassMark scores 5410 - Score per dollar 37
2. amd fx 8120- 177 $ - PassMark scores 6699 - Score per dollar 38
3. core i5 2320- 204 $ - PassMark scores 5760 - Score per dollar 28
4. core i5 3450- 214 $ - PassMark scores 6620 - Score per dollar 31

1. amd fx 6100- 146 $ - 3DMark scores 5460 - Score per dollar 37
2. amd fx 8120- 177 $ - 3DMark scores 5390 - Score per dollar 30
3. core i5 2320- 204 $ - 3DMark scores 3360 - Score per dollar 16
4. core i5 3450- 214 $ - 3DMark scores 5890 - Score per dollar 28

Personally I'm an Intel guy and would choose the latest generation. The i5 3450 is from the latest generation. The i5 2320 is one generation older than the i5 3450.

Im assuming an FX-8320 isnt an option.
I would still get the FX, I cant say thered be a terrible boost from the fx to that next up i5. or any boost.

@cliffordcooley- the marks are probably for apps,but I am mainly interested in games,some sites have shown that amd fx are terrible at gaming

@LNCPapa- the prices I have given are converted from INR.so your prices and mine will not match.
Amonf the four cpus I have listed which one wil be the best overall?

@ikesmasher- sorry, 8320 isnt available here..Some websites such as tom's hardware etc have shown that amd fx cpus perform worse than i3 3220,so I am quite confused !!

If you are gaming with the discrete graphics card, it's hard to justify an AMD CPU right now. Which probably means the 3450, or the 3570K if you're thinking of overclocking. Otherwise might as well save your pennies.

Thats probably due to Intel having better performance per core than AMD. If apps or games are not designed to take advantage of all cores then AMD will lose performance against Intel.

That is most likely for single threaded performance..intel is probably a better option if you are simply gaming/other casual use.

this&

Thanks guys,yes I will be mainly playing games with the CPU,so I think my best bet will be 3450!!

297 $
I think core 3450 is fine,since I am buying 7850 1gb,I dont think 3570k could give me more FPS..

7850 1GB? here you can get a 2GB for $10 more dollars...guess not there. oh well

No,here 2gb is almost 40$ costlier !!

Dangggg

Also,both 1gb and 2gb perform similarly in 1080p,medium-high settings,0-2x AA
that is exactly the settings I am going to use!!

Can anyone please tell me if I use i5 2320 with hd 7850 instead of i5 3450 ,how much decrease in FPS will I notice,playing games such as AC3 ,far cry3 at 1080p,medium settings??

Do not buy the fx or intel cpu they are not worth the price. Get a AMD Phenom II X4 965 on amazon for $90. I have it paired up with a HD Radeon 6850 graphics card and I can play mw3, crysis 3, etc. on extra high settings with no problem while downloading a 2gb bluray movie in the background.

The hd radeon 6850 ($150) is 1gb but it works perfectly for me, although 2gb would be better, but thats not needed unless you're doing some hardcore stuff which by this forum you're not, just a few games.

And the Phenom II X4 965 is 3.4 ghz, as fast as a intel i5 3570K, but 60% less on price. intel can be better in performance wise but the difference is small, definetly not worth the extra $120.

My opinion differs, I feel my i7-2600K has been well worth it's price. If I had settled for a processor with half its performance, I would be upgrading again much sooner.