AMD merges graphics and CPU operations

By on May 7, 2009, 5:29 AM
Advanced Micro Devices announced the consolidation of its microprocessor and graphics businesses today, in an effort to increase operating efficiency. The divisions are structured around its core business elements: products, future development, marketing and sales. In effect of the transition, senior vice president of the Computing Solutions Group, Randy Allen, left the company. Rick Bergman, former senior vice president and general manager of AMD’s Graphics Product Group (ATI, as you well know) is now in the cockpit of all AMD’s platforms and products.

Although ATI was officially acquired by AMD for $5.4 billion in 2006, it stood as an independent business unit. The merger is effectively introducing ATI to AMD’s mainstream operations, which the company hopes will aid in increasing profit after ten consecutive quarterly losses. The acquisition has yet to fulfill AMD’s expectations in terms of financial or technological benefits. The company also recently spun off its manufacturing assets to GlobalFoundries in an attempt to slash production costs.

When AMD purchased ATI, it shared plans of fusing a CPU and GPU on a single chip. The release of this aspiration was delayed late last year, from 2009 to 2011, due to development concerns and economies of scale. Despite the newly unified model, the company is still planning on selling graphics products under the ATI name.

User Comments: 5

Got something to say? Post a comment
Rick said:
[quote]AMD merges graphics and CPU operations [/quote]When I read this, I thought to myself, "Oooh, so AMD is working on distributing processing power between graphics processors and CPUs for general, every day usage..."LOL.
Matthew said:
Haha, you know, I thought the same thing when I first typed it. I couldn't really come up with a better title at 4AM. Nevertheless, the headline is fitting, just easy to misconstrue.
FoReWoRd said:
ooo, first CPU then this got tooo much so they invented a GPU, now they want to merge them back together again, undermining years of work.... people these days....
supersmashbrada said:
I'm curious to know if it will perform better than intels version, which is going to be relatively cheap I hear. Why step into a losing battle. I hope AMD comes out back on top with this.
Zeromus said:
Sorry, Intel fan all the way. Hopefully this new brands of processors are just as affordable than the drop down AMD quad-cores these days. I love that, $200 quad cores.
Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.