Home › News › Hardware
Kingston unveils world's first 256GB USB flash drive
The drive is capable of holding up to 365 CDs – or one album for every day of the year. The 256GB DataTraveler 300 features read rates of up to 20MB/s and write of 10MB/s. Given its storage capacity, the drive is a bit bulky at 2.78” x .67” x .87” but it shouldn’t detract much from its portability. While the drive is ReadyBoost-capable, its password software will not work properly if ReadyBoost cache is enabled.
It is built to order and ships with a five-year warranty and 24/7 tech support. According to Kingston’s website the DataTraveler300 is available in the Far East, Middle East and Africa only. The MSRP is £565.67 (about $935.11).
User Comments (13)
Post a comment|
Technochicken
on July 20, 2009 10:18 AM |
My god that's massive. If my calculations are right, and the flash drive actually could average a 10mb/s write speed, it would still take a bit over 7 hours to fill. This will only appeal to a very small group of customers though. For that price, you could buy 9 terabytes worth of external hard drive space. |
|
Burty117
on July 20, 2009 10:52 AM |
Possibly the most expensive and useless USB drive in the world, wait for a USB 3.0 capable one for this kind of size. |
|
Vrmithrax
on July 20, 2009 11:03 AM |
Could make for a hell of a backup system for mobile/isolated platforms with fairly small drives (160s maybe). Or a backup for your media... But, umm, why would you want to? You could get an SSD and put it in an external 2.5 drive enclosure, for less money and much faster performance. The only premium feature going for it is the smaller form factor. |
|
Matthew
on July 20, 2009 11:58 AM |
Granted, there are both faster and larger capacity solutions but I think (as usual) most people overlook the target. This is not meant to be the fastest nor largest capacity storage option - no USB flash drive is. It's meant to be portable - and it is. Yes, a one-thousand-dollar 256GB USB flash drive has a limited audience. I think the fact that they're built to order shows that Kingston realizes this. Nevertheless, the drive is probably very useful to a handful of professionals out there. You can compare apples to oranges all day long, but the bottom line is, this thumb drive has the highest capacity presently available and it doesn't sacrifice much in the size department. |
|
Guest
on July 20, 2009 12:17 PM |
Just give it a while, and the price will come down as all other pieces of tech. Fairly excited that they're producing these now, only a matter of time before we see 1TB flash/jump drives. |
|
TomSEA
on July 20, 2009 12:30 PM |
I can't even imagine what processes, applications or files you would need one of these for. It's impressive no doubt. But as example, a typical DivX movie is only 700mb. You really want a thumb drive to tote around nearly 300 movies? |
|
Guest
on July 20, 2009 5:43 PM |
readyboost is going to suck balls with those r/w speeds |
|
Technochicken
on July 20, 2009 6:44 PM |
Readyboost speeds up your computer by using the extremely low access time of solid state drives, so bandwidth is not as important. With readyboost, the flash drive will never have to transfer 10mb/s. For such an expensive drive though, I'm surprised that there aren't other connectivity options besides USB. For instance, I've seen flash drives that have eSATA on one side, and USB on the other. |
|
Wendig0
on July 20, 2009 9:07 PM |
This type of drive would be great for Seismic software companies that routinely demo their products for large oil companies. After having worked in IT for one of them, and managing the bulky external drives the sales force checked out, this type of portability would most likely be appealing to the salesmen of those companies. eSata, however, should be an available option. |
|
tengeta
on July 20, 2009 11:12 PM |
Get R/W speeds up or you can make 20TB flash drives that have little to no more use than 2GB ones. |
|
Guest
on July 21, 2009 1:15 AM |
That's bigger than my hard drive. I want one. |
|
license27kill
on July 22, 2009 2:43 AM |
talking about great and huge storage.. i might need flash drive.. but i dont need expensive and bigger storage that will prove as fast as the smaller ones. 40-60 gig is enough. 250gig is sick. i will really wait for that portable ssd to be cheap.. |
|
Guest
on July 22, 2009 5:40 PM |
USB 3.0 wouldn't make any difference as its the memory itself that is slow not the interface. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Is Apple's USB wall adapter really worth $29?
Editors' Smartphone Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.