DirectX 9 Now Available

User Comments: 16

1. December 20, 2002 6:29 AM
   warr said:
   updated. Just for a higher version number. ;)
   Reply
2. December 20, 2002 7:08 AM
   Phantasm66 said:
   I installed it right away on my office machine. No problems at all.
   Reply
3. December 20, 2002 9:06 AM
   Per Hansson said:
   I've installed it on one of my machines to, works fine...
   Reply
4. December 20, 2002 9:43 AM
   MrGaribaldi said:
   Installed A OK here, though there is one thing that puzzles me...All the DirectX files are Final Retail, with one exception:mfc42.dllAnd it's been beta since 07.12.1999!Anyone know why this is still in beta state?
   Reply
5. December 20, 2002 8:44 PM
   warr said:
   According to the Inquirer, m$ said this is still the beta release.but never mind. since i already installed, as long as it doesn't cause sh!t, then i don't bother it. well, seldom use windoz any way. only when i need to patch or update. :grinthumb
   Reply
6. December 21, 2002 1:34 AM
   Phantasm66 said:
   this is the final version as far as I have been told
   Reply
7. December 21, 2002 11:17 AM
   Unregistered said:
   now all we need are some new dx9 opimized detonators drivers to go with it.
   Reply
8. December 21, 2002 9:06 PM
   Vehementi said:
   Too bad ATi already has Catalyst 3.0's 8)NVIDIA will soon release Detonator 2384273957234.328472398523's or something. Sucks for them, they don't even have any DX9 cards :haha: /me laughs and points at NVIDIA...And the sad thing is, they won't for like a year! :haha:And I have been told that this is the final version of DirectX 9 as well.We have like 3 news posts about the same subject :confused:Anyway, I installed DX9 along with the Cat 3.0's, and so far they work just fine.
   Reply
9. December 22, 2002 4:51 AM
   warr said:
   NVidiot's next card is also not fully DX9 complient.they chopped some features in order to keep their FPS high.
   Reply
10. December 22, 2002 4:03 PM
    SNGX1275 said:
    [quote][i]Originally posted by warr [/i][b]NVidiot's next card is also not fully DX9 complient.they chopped some features in order to keep their FPS high. [/b][/quote] Nvidia says otherwise: [url]http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=IO_20021218_8063[/url
    
    Reply
11. December 22, 2002 8:58 PM
    warr said:
    [quote][i]Originally posted by SNGX1275 [/i][b]Nvidia says otherwise: [url]http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=IO_20021218_8063[/url] [/b][/quote] at first i wanna have a look, then i stopped myself. why? i see the website is on their own website. so what do you expect?their marketing gone crap to say themselves bad? ;)
    Reply
12. December 22, 2002 9:03 PM
    ---agissi--- said:
    hey NVidia rulz....so shhh ya mouth, no probz on the DX9 drivers.:grinthumb
    Reply
13. December 22, 2002 9:50 PM
    Vehementi said:
    Yeah, and apples are better than oranges.
    Reply
14. December 22, 2002 11:03 PM
    ---agissi--- said:
    yeah!:p
    Reply
15. December 22, 2002 11:54 PM
    SNGX1275 said:
    Hey man - I was just posting a link, and saying Nvidia says its DX9 complient, make of that what you will, nothing more nothing less. :)
    Reply
16. December 23, 2002 9:04 AM
    Unregistered said:
    actually I was bashing on 'warr'...
    Reply

Recently commented stories