Home › News › Mobile Computing
Microsoft inks Android patent deal with Acer, ViewSonic
Microsoft has added two more companies to the list of Android device manufacturers paying it royalties over mobile patents: Acer and Viewsonic. The agreement with Acer covers Microsoft's patent portfolio for their tablets and smartphones running Android, while one with ViewSonic covers tablets and mobile phones running Android or Chrome OS. No exact financial terms were disclosed by the companies involved.
In a statement, Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft's deputy general counsel of intellectual property and licensing, said the company is pleased that Acer and ViewSonic entered into the deals as part of a program "to help companies address Android's IP issues."
Neither Acer nor ViewSonic are big players in the Android world, but like everyone else, they are trying grab a piece of the tablet market. Microsoft on the other hand is using its patent arsenal to deter Android's growth, with added costs and legal complexity, while making its Windows and Windows Phone platforms more attractive to OEMs.
The company has already managed to successfully extract royalty fees from HTC, Onkyo, U.S. defense contractor General Dynamics Itronix, Velocity Micro, and Wistron. They are also seeking $15 per Android device from Samsung and have sued Motorola and Barnes & Noble for selling products with Android software.
Google announced plans to buy Motorola Mobility and its huge collection of patents for $12.5 billion. Whether that will give the company enough ammo to defend its mobile platform and partners from these threats remains to be seen.
User Comments (5)
Post a comment|
aj_the_kidd
on September 8, 2011 9:47 PM |
Whilst MS are entitled to the royalties because they have the patents, I still don't like this move: Microsoft on the other hand is using its patent arsenal to deter Android's growth, with added costs and legal complexity, while making its Windows and Windows Phone platforms more attractive to OEMs. But i guess that's how they got so successful in the first place. |
|
lawfer
on September 8, 2011 11:05 PM |
aj_the_kidd said: Whilst MS are entitled to the royalties because they have the patents, I still don't like this move: Microsoft on the other hand is using its patent arsenal to deter Android's growth, with added costs and legal complexity, while making its Windows and Windows Phone platforms more attractive to OEMs. But i guess that's how they got so successful in the first place. Not quite. That's how anybody becomes successful in the first place. |
|
aj_the_kidd
on September 9, 2011 12:32 AM |
lawfer said: aj_the_kidd said: Whilst MS are entitled to the royalties because they have the patents, I still don't like this move: Microsoft on the other hand is using its patent arsenal to deter Android's growth, with added costs and legal complexity, while making its Windows and Windows Phone platforms more attractive to OEMs. But i guess that's how they got so successful in the first place. Not quite. That's how anybody becomes successful in the first place.
If only i had something worth patenting |
|
Guest
on September 9, 2011 9:14 AM |
if your apple, you just patent something thin retanglular, with a button, and sue the crap out of anyone who has anything else. even remotly similar, and if its not, photoshop it until it is. |
|
Guest
on September 9, 2011 10:52 AM |
I patent time machine. I patent teleportation machine. When someone actually build the machines, I'll sue you. The judges handling the cases are inadequate to make rulings. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Is Apple's USB wall adapter really worth $29?
Editors' Laptop Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.