Gigabyte issues BIOS update for fire-prone motherboards

By on December 27, 2011, 5:00 PM

Overclocking isn't the game of Russian roulette it used to be. Component makers have embraced the practice by enhancing quality control, designing simple interfaces, implementing failsafes, expanding warranties and more. Although you're less likely to experience catastrophic failure, disaster can and does strike occasionally as one Taiwanese enthusiast recently learned.

Last week, YouTube user "japan0827" uploaded a video of his overclocked testbed releasing a plume of smoke (skip to 3:45 or so). Mourning his loss, the overclocker shared his experience around various Asian message boards with detailed pictures identifying his Gigabyte motherboard as the culprit. More specifically, a MOSFET in his Gigabyte X79-UD3's CPU VRM.

Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated incident. Gigabyte released a press release this week acknowledging that it has received similar complaints from other overclockers who own the GA-X79-UD3, GA-X79-UD5 and G1.Assassin 2 -- the company's main LGA2011 products. Gigabyte blames the issue on a combination of poor quality PWM components and bad firmware.

To solve the problem, the manufacturer has released a BIOS update (version F7) that throttles the CPU during extreme loads. This should protect your VRM from going haywire, but it will also foil your attempts to overclock. You can update your BIOS with the package provided in the download section of your motherboard's product page (UD3, UD5, G1.Assassin 2).

If you're afraid to flash your own BIOS, Gigabyte will do it for you. The company is also offering an unconditional return policy if you'd rather replace your board. The press release mentions a lifetime warranty for the above-mentioned motherboards, but we imagine it's not all-encompassing and only covers this specific PWM issue (Google Translate isn't crystal clear).




User Comments: 6

Got something to say? Post a comment
bexwhitt said:

I don't have much sympathy for overclockers though as these boards are supposed to be "ultra durable" gigabyte probably share the blame

hahahanoobs hahahanoobs said:

You don't have sympathy for overclockers? Um.. okay.

Now to something relevant... I'd avoid these boards like the plague until the next revision. For what you pay for X79 boards, this "fix" is NOT acceptable one bit.

Tekkaraiden Tekkaraiden said:

I love the smell of burnt silicon in the morning.

dividebyzero dividebyzero, trainee n00b, said:

...Google Translate isn't crystal clear

I refuse to believe this

hahahanoobs hahahanoobs said:

This is just bad.

Gigabyte can go jump in a lake and stay there. Instead of giving you a replacement motherboard under a new revision with parts that aren't faulty, they want you to keep the faulty board and use a firmware that cripples your CPU overclocks. Gigabyte didn't learn anything from the Intel P67 SATA III fiasco... and that was said to take a couple years before those ports went kaput. Yay Intel, BOOO Gigabyte.

Guest said:

I agree because of ignorant users like this. The Intel® 6 Series B2 Chipset recall was an Intel® issue and that was SATAII! Not Gigabyte's fault and not SATAIII. Get your facts right if you are going to comment!

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.