Quantum computers looking more realistic with major storage breakthrough

By on November 15, 2013, 8:30 AM
storage, quantum storage, quantum computer, quantum, qubit

We may not see quantum computers in our homes for many decades, but a recent storage breakthrough has made it all the more possible. Previously, quantum data bits (qubits) needed to be stored at temperatures close to absolute zero, and when raised to room temperature, they would be destroyed in just two seconds. Now, scientists have managed to keep qubits 'alive' for a whole 39 minutes, considerably longer than in the past.

The long-lasting qubits were formed by placing phosphorus impurities into pieces of silicon, with each phosphorus ion acting as the piece of data. Holding the qubits in superposition - which allows the nuclei to act as a 1 and a 0 at the same time - was achieved, critical to quantum computing.

Unfortunately, the data from a qubit can still only be read when its frozen, so each qubit needs to be refrozen after operations are performed in a process that currently destroys around 63% of the data. However the good news is that 39 minutes of alive qubits at room temperature is a long time for quantum computing, with each operation on a single qubit taking ten microseconds. This means 20 million operations can be performed before 1% of the qubits decayed.

The next step for quantum storage is having diverse data, rather than just all 1s or all 0s like was used in this experiment. That step likely won't be achieved for some time, but with consistent research and breakthroughs like the one discussed here, in our lifetimes we might get to play with immensely powerful quantum computers.




User Comments: 4

Got something to say? Post a comment
Skidmarksdeluxe Skidmarksdeluxe said:

"in our lifetimes we might get to play with immensely powerful quantum computers".

No doubt things will get better, faster, smaller & more affordable as time goes on but I'm quite happy with what I have for now thanks. I don't think I'll be playing with quantum computers in my lifetime.

Teko03 said:

"We many not see quantum computers in our homes for many decades...", I'm thinknig you guys meant to say "may".

Crunches said:

"We many not see quantum computers in our homes for many decades...", I'm thinknig you guys meant to say "may".

We the many

Kibaruk Kibaruk, TechSpot Paladin, said:

"We many not see quantum computers in our homes for many decades...", I'm thinknig you guys meant to say "may".

We the many

Edited to lulz you.

Getting back to topic, we'll see this happening sooner that you might expect, considering how fast it has developed from an idea to what is going on right now.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.