DARPA unleashes 20-foot autonomous robo-tank with glowing green eyes

zohaibahd

Posts: 88   +1
Staff
TL;DR: The Pentagon's mad scientists have been cooking up a beast of an unmanned combat vehicle, and it just took a major step forward. DARPA recently put its 12-ton RACER Heavy Platform (RHP) autonomous tank through a fresh round of testing out in the wild.

For those not in the know, DARPA has been working on self-driving military vehicles for two decades now as part of its RACER (Robotic Autonomy in Complex Environments with Resiliency) program. The goal is to develop autonomous ground vehicles that can navigate off-road terrain without any human input.

This newest phase involved letting the RHP loose on some legit US military training grounds in Texas. The video showed off rugged, obstacle-filled environments packed with vegetation, waterways, ditches, and rocky outcrops. Exactly the kind of hellish conditions that could give a self-driving system a full-on meltdown.

But DARPA's 20-foot-long unmanned behemoth seemed to handle it all without breaking a sweat. The agency reports the RHP knocked out 30 miles of autonomous route-following and cruised along at speeds of up to 25 mph.

To clarify, the RHP testing, assisted by University of Washington and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, occurred late 2023 but has just been announced by DARPA.

One peculiar feature that stood out in the video was the vehicle's glowing green eyes. They do add a touch of futurism that DARPA was likely trying to go for but also appear a tad quirky at times. Apparently, they serve a purpose - a spokesperson for the agency told Gizmodo that "it's just an indicator light to show the status of the vehicle. Green = it's on and in autonomy mode."

Anyway, DARPA says that the 12-ton RACER is designed to support other members of the RACER Fleet Vehicles (RFVs). But those other vehicles are more like self-driving ATVs. Meanwhile, this tank-scaled RHP takes autonomous capabilities to a whole new level of heavy-duty.

DARPA intends to keep iterating on RACER every 6 months or so, continually ramping up the autonomous tech. The RHP is based on an existing Textron combat vehicle platform used by the Army.

Ultimately, the agency seems to be aiming for unmanned combat vehicles that can roll into battle without risking human lives. These could handle dangerous roles like scouting, resupplying, or even paving the way with firepower before troops move in. An AI-driven tank definitely sounds terrifying. But it might just offer a safer alternative to boots on the ground.

Of course, we're still years away from anything like that becoming an actual deployable system. DARPA has been at this RACER rodeo since 2004 when it started with just getting a self-driving car to navigate a simple 1-mile course. Now, two decades later, it has an autonomous tank tearing across training grounds.

Permalink to story:

 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks
 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks
So tanks now are basically just mobile artilary instead of being armor meant to break through a line. Anti missle and anti drone tech has gotten so good that lobbing "dumb" projectiles is starting to become more effective. This is a large reason why the US is recommissioning the battle ships. While we are still building missile destroyers, "smart" munitions are losing their effectiveness while also being more expensive.
 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks

We are not there yet; for now the strategy is "Our bombs are bigger or in greater supply than yours, so leave us alone"
 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks
Depends on the purpose. I have seen Russians build monstrous additional armors on top of their tanks.
Supposedly, it is so thick that FPV drone cannot damage the tank.
A mosquito cannot shoot a round from a 3 meter long tube flying with incredible speed.
A mosquito would be great to attack small meaty targets, but that is all.
I recall the last terrorist leader killed by us, was hit by a very precise that flew through the car and ended his evil existence. That is even better for important targets.
 
First off...not a tank. Also that thing looks lik a 25mm bushmaster would make mincemeat out of it; what a weirdly high profiled and undersloped vehicle. This is wha happens when you forget what real wars look like.
 
Depends on the purpose. I have seen Russians build monstrous additional armors on top of their tanks.
Supposedly, it is so thick that FPV drone cannot damage the tank.
A mosquito cannot shoot a round from a 3 meter long tube flying with incredible speed.
A mosquito would be great to attack small meaty targets, but that is all.
I recall the last terrorist leader killed by us, was hit by a very precise that flew through the car and ended his evil existence. That is even better for important targets.
I think the ability to enter enemy terrain unnoticed and eliminate anyone without attracting attention would be more effective in ending the war than a continuous conflict like the Russia-Ukraine war.

Imagine someone snapping their fingers and publicly announcing "We're going to end this war now." and simultaneously all the generals fall lifeless. "So, do you want to continue?".
But the allies and Putin himself insist and end up falling to the ground lifeless one after the other.

Chaotic, frightening... I imagine the future like this, but with the government doing this to its own people. :)
 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks
Russian Soviet tech from the 60s really isn't indicative of the usefulness of armor. The t-90 has many of the same weaknesses and components as the t-62 ffs.
 
I know why they put "Green Eyes" on that thing, it's equiped with Nvidia hardware for AI. When they will be Red then you know it's AMD powered.

As for Intel it would have Blue eyes and a blonde wig.
 
A US tank - as normal, great in straight lines, but can it handle corners? ;-)
 
Last edited:
In my head movies I'm visualizing an AI apocalypse with these things roaming around dropping off AI controlled robotic dogs with flamethrowers and AI drones with guns.
 
There w
In my head movies I'm visualizing an AI apocalypse with these things roaming around dropping off AI controlled robotic dogs with flamethrowers and AI drones with guns.
There was a good 'Black Mirror' episode in a similar vein
 
Thousands of robots the size of mosquitoes would do more damage and be of greater strategic value in changing the course of a war than those ill-fated tanks
Billions of robots the size of germs would do more damage than thousands of mosquito sized robots ... whats your point? We do not have the technology for either of these things.
 
The costs for drone's like those being used in Ukraine are far more effective and cost efficient than a single tank plus no repairs, maintenance, etc. I hope our military is looking into that instead of going to the "big dollar" solutions.
 
First off...not a tank. Also that thing looks lik a 25mm bushmaster would make mincemeat out of it; what a weirdly high profiled and undersloped vehicle. This is wha happens when you forget what real wars look like.

Yeah, if it doesn’t need space for people I would imagine it to be really low to be hard to see and hit. Does it even need AI, the operator could be near by, just like drones.
 
Back