Benchmarks: AS SSD Benchmark
The HyperX 3K's sequential reads were again exceptionally strong, surpassing every drive tested except the Crucial m4, which claimed the top position by a meager 0.1MB/s. Disappointingly, SSDNow V+200 slipped behind the SSDNow V+100.
Both of Kingston's new arrivals performed well when measuring sequential writes, with the consumer-oriented unit taking second place and the business-oriented drive distancing itself from the V+100 and Pyro.
The HyperX 3K's 4K-64 thread performance was weaker than expected, landing behind the 520 Series and original HyperX. Meanwhile, the SSDNow V+200 sustained a respectable 151.8MB/s.
The HyperX 3K finished the 4K-64 thread test on a high note with a write throughput of 249.2MB/s, well ahead of every other drive tested. Likewise, the V+200 was notably faster than its competing drives.
The HyperX 3K had a read access of 0.068ms, which is slightly slower than 520 Series' 0.046ms, yet faster than the standard HyperX's 0.151ms, which is about what the SSDNow V+200 offered.
Both new Kingston drives had a similar write access times at 0.219ms and 0.241ms, which was a notch behind the 520 Series and SSDNow V+100, though the HyperX 3K did manage to beat the original drive.
Featured on Storage
Legion Hardware Reviews
From the Forums
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.