Read on full site | Join TechSpot! (it's free) | Bookmark / Share this



BSODs 0x24 and 0x4E with an ASUS P5Q-E

liver
09-26-2008, 01:11 PM
Hello,

I've come here as my last solution... since Microsoft support and ASUS support couldn't help me... If any of you could help me, I'd be very grateful!

I have been experiencing problems since I constructed this new computer 2 weeks ago. My problem is that, often, when copying a folder from my IDE Samsung hdd to my SATA-II Seagate hdd, I get the Stop error with the code 0x24, indicating the Ntfs.sys driver.
Also, often when deleting a folder from the Seagate drive, after all the files have been deleted and all that is left to remove is the empty folder, I get the Stop error 0x4E. I must say that, in each case that I had these errors, the FAILURE_BUCKET_ID and most of the STACK_TEXT was the same for all errors of the same type! For the 0x24, the FAILURE_BUCKET_ID was Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+11, and for the 0x4E it was nt!MmZeroPageThread+250.

My system hardware specs are:
Asus P5Q-E motherboard
Intel Q9550 processor
2x1GB Corsair TWIN2X-8500C5D 1066 Mhz (I left the default configuration in BIOS for these)
Gigabyte Geforce 8600GT
Seagate SATA-II 500GB (AHCI enabled in BIOS)
Samsung SP2514N 250GB IDE (set as master, connected to the Marvell88SE61xx IDE port on the board)
ASUS IDE DVD-RW (set as slave. connected to the Marvell port through the same cable as the Samsung HDD)
Corsair 450W PSU
I don't do any overclocking

My system drivers and BIOS installed:
I'm using Windows XP SP3
BIOS version 1.1.0.L70d (this is what the board came with)
Marvell SCSI/RAID controller v1.2.0.60
Intel Matrix Storage Manager v800103
Intel P45 ICH10R Chipset v9001009

Things I've done to try to solve the problem:
Ran CHKDSK. There were no problems found.
Installed the latest drivers - the problem was not solved.
Scanned for viruses and I didn't find any. (Scanned with Kaspersky)
Checked the RAM with memtest86+ (3 passes), checked the Seagate HDD with Seatools... there were no problems found.

I have yet to install the latest BIOS, because from what I saw on the ASUS site, most of the improvements listed were only for memory compatibility. But my Corsair memories are fully supported, as it is said in the User's Manual.

I really hope you could help me. I've been struggling with this issue for almost 2 weeks! :(


NTFS_FILE_SYSTEM (24)
Arguments:
Arg1: 001902fe
Arg2: bad23910
Arg3: bad2360c
Arg4: ba59cb9d

Debugging Details:

EXCEPTION_RECORD: bad23910 -- (.exr 0xffffffffbad23910)
ExceptionAddress: ba59cb9d (Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+0x00000011)
ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
Parameter[0]: 00000000
Parameter[1]: 00000005
Attempt to read from address 00000005

CONTEXT: bad2360c -- (.cxr 0xffffffffbad2360c)
eax=00000001 ebx=879ee558 ecx=e13d9d64 edx=e1332818 esi=bad23a58 edi=80546934
eip=ba59cb9d esp=bad239d8 ebp=bad23a08 iopl=0 nv up ei ng nz na pe nc
cs=0008 ss=0010 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00010286
Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+0x11:
ba59cb9d 8b5004 mov edx,dword ptr [eax+4] ds:0023:00000005=????????
Resetting default scope

CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1

PROCESS_NAME: System

ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at "0x%08lx" referenced memory at "0x%08lx". The memory could not be "%s".

READ_ADDRESS: 00000005

BUGCHECK_STR: 0x24

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: NULL_CLASS_PTR_DEREFERENCE

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from ba578c44 to ba59cb9d

STACK_TEXT:
bad23a08 ba578c44 88006100 e13d9d64 88006260 Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+0x11
bad23a30 ba527587 879ee558 bad23a58 bad23a63 Ntfs!NtfsDeleteFcb+0x108
bad23a7c ba548e7c 879ee558 88006100 e13d9cc8 Ntfs!NtfsTeardownFromLcb+0x1fd
bad23ad4 ba5237a4 879ee558 e13d9d90 e13d9f28 Ntfs!NtfsTeardownStructures+0x125
bad23b00 ba5466b5 879ee558 013d9d90 e13d9f28 Ntfs!NtfsDecrementCloseCounts+0x9e
bad23b84 ba546454 879ee558 e13d9d90 e13d9cc8 Ntfs!NtfsCommonClose+0x398
bad23c24 804ef18f 88006020 8794d3f0 00000002 Ntfs!NtfsFsdClose+0x21f
bad23c34 b0e44d00 8794d400 882271d0 88489b08 nt!IopfCallDriver+0x31
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
bad23cdc b0e474e3 0026b948 8794d3f0 804ef18f klif+0x12d00
bad23d30 805bb466 00489b08 00000000 88489af0 klif+0x154e3
bad23d4c 805266ca 88489b08 00000000 00000000 nt!ObpRemoveObjectRoutine+0xe0
bad23d64 8050a88a 806e6aa8 879eac20 80561db4 nt!ObfDereferenceObject+0x4c
bad23d8c 8050c0c9 e345b590 00000000 89e33da8 nt!MiSegmentDelete+0xec
bad23dac 805cff64 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt!MiDereferenceSegmentThread+0xa7
bad23ddc 805460de 8050c022 00000000 00000000 nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x34
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt!KiThreadStartup+0x16


FOLLOWUP_IP:
Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+11
ba59cb9d 8b5004 mov edx,dword ptr [eax+4]

SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 0

SYMBOL_NAME: Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+11

FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner

MODULE_NAME: Ntfs

IMAGE_NAME: Ntfs.sys

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 48025be5

STACK_COMMAND: .cxr 0xffffffffbad2360c ; kb

FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0x24_Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+11

BUCKET_ID: 0x24_Ntfs!NtfsDereferenceQuotaControlBlock+11

Followup: MachineOwner

*************************************************************************** ***********

PFN_LIST_CORRUPT (4e)
Typically caused by drivers passing bad memory descriptor lists (ie: calling
MmUnlockPages twice with the same list, etc). If a kernel debugger is
available get the stack trace.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000008f, The free or zeroed page listhead is corrupt
Arg2: 00062008, new page
Arg3: 0007f188, old page
Arg4: 00000000, 0

Debugging Details:

BUGCHECK_STR: 0x4E_8f

CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 2

DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: DRIVER_FAULT

PROCESS_NAME: System

LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 8051cbb4 to 804f9f33

STACK_TEXT:
bacc37f8 8051cbb4 0000004e 0000008f 00062008 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1b
bacc3840 80698b94 89e404b0 00000000 00000044 nt!MmZeroPageThread+0x250
bacc3dac 805cff64 80084000 00000000 00000000 nt!Phase1Initialization+0x1288
bacc3ddc 805460de 8069790c 80084000 00000000 nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x34
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt!KiThreadStartup+0x16


STACK_COMMAND: kb

FOLLOWUP_IP:
nt!MmZeroPageThread+250
8051cbb4 cc int 3

SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 1

SYMBOL_NAME: nt!MmZeroPageThread+250

FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner

MODULE_NAME: nt

DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4802516a

IMAGE_NAME: memory_corruption

FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0x4E_8f_nt!MmZeroPageThread+250

BUCKET_ID: 0x4E_8f_nt!MmZeroPageThread+250

Followup: MachineOwner

Route44
09-27-2008, 12:22 AM
Boy, you did everything I would have suggested except MemTest should be run with a minimum of 7 PASSES. I don't know if this will help but perhaps the following information can help:

0x0000004E: PFN_LIST_CORRUPT
This indicates that the memory management Page File Number list is corrupted. Can be caused by corrupt physical RAM, or by drivers passing bad memory descriptor lists. Your read-out shows corrupted memory.

0x00000024: NTFS_FILE_SYSTEM
A problem occurred within NTFS.SYS, the driver file that allows the system to read and write to NTFS file system drives. There may be a physical problem with the disk, or an Interrupt Request Packet (IRP) may be corrupted. Other common causes include heavy hard drive fragmentation, heavy file I/O, problems with some types of drive-mirroring software, or some antivirus software. I suggest running ChkDsk or ScanDisk as a first step; then disable all file system filters such as virus scanners, firewall software, or backup utilities. Check the file properties of NTFS.SYS to ensure it matches the current OS or SP version. Update all disk, tape backup, CD-ROM, or removable device drivers to the most current versions.

I wonder if your IDE set as Master isn't causing conflict with your SATA. I have seen this often where an IDE/SATA conflicts. Why, I don't know but as I said I've seen it before.

Also, are you doing any overclocking? If you are try easing back on your timings.

Ad
09-27-2008, 12:22 AM
  

liver
09-27-2008, 05:10 PM
I will run Memtest for at least 7 passes, as you suggested.

About the IDE set as master, should I make it be slave? Can it be slave if the other IDE device, the DVD, is set as slave too?

Route44
09-27-2008, 09:57 PM
I suggest running your DVD and your Samsung HD separate from each other.

liver
10-04-2008, 01:31 PM
The cause was an incompatibility between the Intel Q9550 and the BIOS (v901 or later). I solved it by setting CPU Margin Enhancement to "Performance Mode" instead of "Optimised Mode" (default setting).

Thanks for trying to help.

Route44
10-04-2008, 04:53 PM
Thanks for getting back to us. This information is helpful for other people.

Post a reply, see related topics & more

Tip: Download Advanced SystemCare 3 Free - Clean, Repair, Protect & Optimize your PC.



 Top Technology News

TechSpot Blog: Disable Windows automatic check for solutions after a program crashes

Weekend Open Forum: Google Chrome OS and the future of cloud computing

Tech Tip of the Week: Unearth Region-Specific Windows 7 Themes

Weekend tech reading: How to run Chrome OS as a virtual machine

Sony: PlayStation 3 to be 3D-capable via firmware update

iSuppli: DDR3 to account for over half of DRAM shipments by Q2 2010

Facebook named third most popular video website behind YouTube and Hulu

Patriot introduces new PS-100 SSD series

More Tech News

  
 Software Downloads

Norton Virus Definitions 2003-07 November 20, 2009

AVG Anti-Virus Updates November 20, 2009

Norton Virus Definitions 2008-09 November 20, 2009

avast! Virus Definitions November 20, 2009

McAfee SuperDAT Update 5808

Kaspersky Anti-Virus Update November 20, 2009

Google SketchUp 7.1.6087

More Downloads



Copyright © 1998-2009 TechSpot.com. TechSpot is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.