Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.
|
|||||||
Begin your free trial now
Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month
Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month
Sig Code Permissions
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sig Code Permissions
With the recent crack down on insanely long sigs, (me being one of the targets) I believe it is resonable to ask the forum admin group to enable either IMG script or HTML script in sigs. Due to the lack of some nice system specs in my sig I have been looking for something more interesting to put in it and I came across this -> SigX The only problem being I can not use it on Techspot because both IMG and HTML code are disabled.
If the only reason these codes are disabled is too ensure people do not fill their sigs up with lots of large images or other such space-wasting junk, then surely there is no reason they should be enable so we can use it, and anyone who fills their sig with rubbish can simply get StormBringer's nice little PM, asking them, quite reasonably, to sort their sig out. Anyways, thats just my polite request for the Techspot team. Thanks guys! Steg My SigX Sig - Hopefully the be seen on the boards more often in the future ![]()
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
SigX looks neat, but how much bandwidth does it eat up? I have broadband so I really don’t notice! I was just thinking of dial up users.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am a dial up user
Its only sending a few bytes of text with every update and it updates at best every minute (setting - between 1 -> 20 mins) so even when playing Warcraft III online I don't notice it updating, dispite the fact I have it set on 1 minute .Steg EDIT - Typos Last edited by Steg; 04-18-2004 at 10:57 PM.. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I feel for ya
anyway I would be curious as well to find out why scripting is disabled
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mictlantecuhtli,
Thanks for the info
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
For the long and short of it, basically we chose to disable images in sigs to help keep the forum looking neat. The images just got in the way and cluttered things up.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you also poertner
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can understand that sometimes a bit of personalization to your account can not only serve as a 'good feature to have' but can actually boost one's interest in a forum, among other things... however, not everyone may agree with me but for TechSpot I rather keep information displayed clearly on a very easy-to-read format and so far I believe we are doing just great with that, this is a tech information forum after all, plus a second home to a lot of us.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Most forums I have seen that allow images in the sigs just tend to end up in a mess...
We do not need that "feature" here, I agree fully with Julio
__________________
"The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it."
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh damn, anyways it was worth a try.
Thanks Steg |
![]() |
| Similar Topics | ||||
| Topic | Replies | Forum | ||
Code 12 in xp on a Pci to Pci bridge, Recieve a code 12 error with video card
|
9 | Audio and Video | ||
Permissions Troubles
|
11 | Windows OS | ||
Permissions in Win XP pro
|
0 | Windows OS | ||
Permissions
|
8 | Windows OS | ||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM.





Code 12 in xp on a Pci to Pci bridge, Recieve a code 12 error with video card