also @ TechSpot: Fair Labor Association begins inspections of Foxconn at Apple's request
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > Hardware > Overclocking, Cooling and Modding

Begin your free trial now Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month

Overclocking E8400 Suggestions

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 06-18-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
okay, can i raise my FSB even with my stock cooler? And would synchronizing the RAM with the FSB decrease the memory performance?
  #22  
Old 06-18-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
yeah you should be fine, just don't overdo it. Apart from my Q6600 i own a E6550 and i overclocked it from the stock 2.33 to 3.22, using max multiplier and raising FSB... vcore at 1.328 and all using a stock cooler.

I think to 3.4 or 3.6 is fine as long as you don't volt your cpu too high. Undervolting will only cause your pc to reboot then have the values resetted but over volting can be a bit risky, and it also increases core temp so i suggest raising core temp only when needed, i.e. to gain a bit more stability.
  #23  
Old 06-18-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
Should i leave volting to auto?

Also im having some problems...I put the frequencies to "linked", Put the ratio 1:1, and increased FSB 5 mhz, but when i reload, the initial bios screen doesnt appear until i restart manually, and when i do restart, CPU-Z doesnt show an overclocked cpu..
  #24  
Old 06-18-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
i don't recommend auto volting, but thats weird. might have something to do with you not having performance rams.

even then they should take thing just fine. try linking, testing if it works, leaving the voltage at stock then slowly increasing fsb after that. odd case you've got there but my guess is vcore issues
  #25  
Old 06-18-2009
hellokitty[hk]'s Avatar
I'm a TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: UT, U.S.
Member since: Mar 2008, 3,712 posts
System specs
Quote:
i don't recommend auto volting, but thats weird. might have something to do with you not having performance rams.
have you seen his cpuz shots?

BTW, +5mhz is not any overclock really.
  #26  
Old 06-18-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
i didn't pay much attention to vcore but i'm guessing auto did something >.> and yeah it doesn't make sense that 5 mhz and pc won't boot, thats why i'm blaming auto volt lol
  #27  
Old 06-18-2009
dustin_ds3000's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: AR
Member since: Jun 2007, 1,085 posts
System specs
why is you core voltage so high 1.44 is to high
  #28  
Old 06-18-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
I had the same thought actually, though i took his word when he said he dropped them to stock.
  #29  
Old 06-18-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
i guess 1.44 is stock because i loaded bios defaults.. Should i manually set it?
  #30  
Old 06-18-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
Also, when i enabled linking it booted fine, but as soon as i put the ram ratio to 1:1, im getting the boot problem, i upgraded to 4GB ram recently if that makes a difference...
  #31  
Old 06-18-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
if you didn't manually push it up then it should be stock voltages...

I did some small research and i'm starting to think that its 1.44 by defaults... must've been the processors at the time.

Don't touch the vcore, try just pushing the FSB up. Leave the Vcore to default or manually set it to default.

I actually see some people with 1.41 vcores on their CPU-Z.

hmmm what kind of rams are you using? are they of the same spec? i.e. if 4 dimms all 4 DDR2-800?

I'm guessing your Rams don't like being overclocked much...
  #32  
Old 06-19-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
Im using four of these:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146599

All running in dual channel.
Also should i leave it at "linking"?


I also set the overclocking option to manual. Is that right? I could also choose between "AI Overclocking" where i can increase overclocking by percentages.
  #33  
Old 06-19-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
I'm not familiar with AI Overclocking since i use a Gigabyte board, but yes, use manual overclocking. It may be that the rams don't like having their bus speeds changed... you can leave them alone for now, focus on one bit at a time.

With everything at defaults, pump up the fsb by increments of 0.1 ghz or so (usually i like to take big jumps for the first time, since i know its possible) though you shouldn't stretch it too far. You're not using any overclocking heatsinks so i'd suggest 3.3 Ghz safe for starters.

Go into windows each time and check stability. If unstable, add a little or less vcore and see how it affects, if not turn down the fsb or sometimes even turn up.

I've heard of strange occasions of cpus not liking certain speeds i.e. will boot at 3.2ghz, will not boot at 3.3. but will boot at 3.4ghz

Play around but be gentle with your numbers. Once you find a good core speed and is stable, start tampering with the 1:1 ratio of your ram.

My guess would be that 3.6ghz be your golden number. 400 FSB, 400 Mhz ram, so the full DDR2 800 at synchronous.
  #34  
Old 06-19-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
Okay, thanks alot for the assistance. I will see what i can do
  #35  
Old 06-19-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
Hmm.. As i increase my FSB my core voltage is increasing also... which is giving me some pretty high cpu temps. For example i only increase FSB 10 and it set it to 1.536.
  #36  
Old 06-19-2009
dustin_ds3000's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: AR
Member since: Jun 2007, 1,085 posts
System specs
The E6850 has a VID of 1.35V most of the time. VID = default voltage for those people that didn't know that
  #37  
Old 06-19-2009
smu122's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Feb 2008, 70 posts
System specs
So dustin, are you suggesting mine is too high?
  #38  
Old 06-19-2009
HaMsTeYr's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Member since: Apr 2008, 376 posts
System specs
sounds like you have yours set to auto voltage, yeah as dustin said throw your voltage back down to 1.35
  #39  
Old 06-19-2009
hellokitty[hk]'s Avatar
I'm a TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: UT, U.S.
Member since: Mar 2008, 3,712 posts
System specs
Quote:
So dustin, are you suggesting mine is too high?
Yes thats too high, remember when I yelled at you about having 1.52v? You want to make sure your voltage is UNDER 1.4 with a stock cooler.
Since you recently upgraded to 4 gigs, I don't know what that link is for, but that is low quality RAM, probably the same low quality you have right now, don't buy it.
Closed Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Help o/c P5Q-E with E8400 11 Overclocking, Cooling and Modding
E8400 Wolfdale motherboard Suggestions Needed 2 Processors and Motherboards
Overclocking my E8400 Intel duo core 3 Overclocking, Cooling and Modding
Overclocking suggestions wanted 0 Processors and Motherboards
Overclocking Suggestions/Advice 16 Processors and Motherboards

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.