also @ TechSpot: Windows logo to get a Metro makeover in Windows 8
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > TechSpot News and Comments

Begin your free trial now Pay-as-you-go options starting at $10/user/month

Sony: PlayStation 3 manufacturing costs down 70%

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-31-2009
Jos Jos is offline
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Apr 2006, 904 posts
System specs
Sony: PlayStation 3 manufacturing costs down 70%

During a recent investor conference call, Sony corporate CEO Nobuyuki Oneda revealed that the PlayStation 3 console is now roughly 70% cheaper to make than it was at launch. Although he wouldn’t give an exact figure, estimates put manufacturing costs at around $240 – down from around $800.

Read the whole story
__________________
Jose Vilches
Managing Editor
  #2  
Old 07-31-2009
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Seattle
Member since: Feb 2009, 1,549 posts
System specs
Seems to me that's pretty stupid of Sony to acknowledge that. Basically they're saying, "we're really having a good time sticking it to the people dumb enough to pay $400 for our unit."
  #3  
Old 07-31-2009
Guest
 
That is what companies do you know... make PROFIT
  #4  
Old 07-31-2009
Guest
 
Tell that to M$oft and the xbox360, they breaks from the rollout yet people are stupid enough to keep buying more than 2 systems.
  #5  
Old 07-31-2009
Tekkaraiden's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Mar 2009, 612 posts
So they shouldn't make a profit on something they manufacture?
  #6  
Old 07-31-2009
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Dec 2008, 472 posts
they should keep the price the same IMO. These rumors of a price drop have been going on 4 years, making people hold back, and back on there PS3 purchase.
  #7  
Old 07-31-2009
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Seattle
Member since: Feb 2009, 1,549 posts
System specs
I don't begrudge anyone making a profit by any stretch. It's the whole, "our manufacturing costs have decreased by 70%, but we're not going to bother cutting our loyal customers any slack on the price."
  #8  
Old 07-31-2009
TechSpot Paladin
 
Member since: Jan 2006, 427 posts
System specs
So, now that they're making profit on systems, will they lower the license fees so that our games can be cheaper? Hmm, I doubt it. I thought the console idea was that the game system is sold at a loss and the game titles were where the company profits.
  #9  
Old 07-31-2009
Tekkaraiden's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Mar 2009, 612 posts
Wouldn't their loyal customers already own a PS3? They'd do more for their customers to offer a decent game, hdmi cable or blu-ray remote with each system.
  #10  
Old 07-31-2009
Twister123's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Ireland Europe
Member since: Jun 2009, 219 posts
System specs
Its still a great console , but a decent price reduction might help sales , there lagging behind there competitors , or throw in a second pad a headset etc...
  #11  
Old 08-01-2009
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: England, UK
Member since: Feb 2003, 502 posts
System specs
If you have more consoles on the street, you sell more games and companies see more value in spending any extra licence fees to make games as they see a better return. There has to be a point where Sony stop getting hard-on for having the claim of selling the most expensive console on the market and get back to business.
  #12  
Old 08-01-2009
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Member since: Sep 2006, 255 posts
Lets see they were losing $400 per console...now there making $160. I think they have awhile to recover there loss. Suck it up. The PS3 is an awesome media server for a HDTV and they throw in a blu-ray to boot. Not a bad deal IMO for what it can do.
  #13  
Old 08-01-2009
Wendig0's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Florida
Member since: Oct 2008, 797 posts
System specs
Quote:
windmill007 said:
Lets see they were losing $400 per console...now there making $160. I think they have awhile to recover there loss. Suck it up. The PS3 is an awesome media server for a HDTV and they throw in a blu-ray to boot. Not a bad deal IMO for what it can do.

Agreed. I never complained about the price much after comparing the 360 to the PS3. If you get a 360, you still need to buy several accessories to bring it up to par with all the features of the PS3, making the price comparable to the PS3. After owning both systems, the PS3 is the clear winner in my book. (I shot my 360 after the 3rd RROD and sent it back to Redmond in the prepaid "Coffin". http://www.techspot.com/vb/topic128992.html)
  #14  
Old 08-01-2009
BlindObject's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New Jersey
Member since: May 2007, 446 posts
Slimmed Ps3? Oh shhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiii

I wanna see this.
  #15  
Old 08-01-2009
tengeta's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Member since: Oct 2008, 612 posts
System specs
Suck it up? What a joke, Microsoft had to take the brunt of it, and so did Nintendo. The only difference here is that its your precious Sony at risk.
  #16  
Old 08-01-2009
Twister123's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Ireland Europe
Member since: Jun 2009, 219 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by tengeta View Post
Suck it up? What a joke, Microsoft had to take the brunt of it, and so did Nintendo. The only difference here is that its your precious Sony at risk.
what r u talking about ?
  #17  
Old 08-02-2009
Wendig0's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Florida
Member since: Oct 2008, 797 posts
System specs
Quote:
tengeta said:
Suck it up? What a joke, Microsoft had to take the brunt of it, and so did Nintendo. The only difference here is that its your precious Sony at risk.
I must not be on the same page as you. What does Microsoft and Nintendo have to do with a 70% drop in manufacturing cost for Sony?
  #18  
Old 08-03-2009
tengeta's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Member since: Oct 2008, 612 posts
System specs
They both dropped their consoles prices slightly with the drop in production cost, the guy said its fine for Sony to keep charging this because of initial losses. The Xbox 360 was losing money per console made for the first two years, so why did Sony expect anything different?
  #19  
Old 08-03-2009
Wendig0's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Florida
Member since: Oct 2008, 797 posts
System specs
Quote:
tengeta said:
The Xbox 360 was losing money per console made for the first two years, so why did Sony expect anything different?
Simple. The PS3 is better quality. That might get me labeled as a "fanboy", and that's ok. The simple truth is that there are many more RROD's (and E74 errors) than YLOD's. To be fair, the 360 is the better selling console, yet they have also had many more returns.

I have had 2 PS3's (the first one was stolen within a month of buying it) and 3 360's (all of which broke). Sony FTW. Piss on Microsoft.
  #20  
Old 08-03-2009
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Member since: Jul 2009, 822 posts
Quote:
TomSEA said:
Seems to me that's pretty stupid of Sony to acknowledge that. Basically they're saying, "we're really having a good time sticking it to the people dumb enough to pay $400 for our unit."
It's funny how this is the typical response to stories like this... Completely ignore the part where the units were $800+ when they were first being built, and were being sold at a loss for YEARS, rather than charging what they really cost, let alone having any profit margin. Now Sony can finally recoup some of the hardware costs through real hardware profit, not just licensing fees, and the first thing people do is scream for them to lower their prices... Amazing how people are never satisfied.
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Will DST IT costs eclipse energy savings costs? 5 General Discussion
Sony shrinks PS2 chips -- cuts costs 0 General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.